Those questioning Former Army Sergeant Chuck Hagel’s
credentials to serve as Secretary of Defense should ponder Shakespeare’s famous St. Crispin's Day Speech delivered by Henry V
before the Battle of Agincourt to see if there might be a subconscious reason
for their bias.
From this day to the ending of
the world,
But we in it shall be remembered,
We few, we happy few, we band of brothers.
For he today that sheds his blood with me
Shall be my brother; be he ne'er so vile,
This day shall gentle his condition.
And gentlemen inEngland
now abed
Shall think themselves accursed they were not here,
And hold their manhoods cheap whiles any speaks
That fought with us upon Saint Crispin's Day.
But we in it shall be remembered,
We few, we happy few, we band of brothers.
For he today that sheds his blood with me
Shall be my brother; be he ne'er so vile,
This day shall gentle his condition.
And gentlemen in
Shall think themselves accursed they were not here,
And hold their manhoods cheap whiles any speaks
That fought with us upon Saint Crispin's Day.
Question: What do Florida Senator Marco Rubio, Bill
Kristol (Weekly Standard), Texas Senator John Cornyn, Bret Stevens (Wall Street Journal), Pennsylvania
Senator Pat Toomey, New Hampshire Senator Kelly
Ayotte, and Abe Foxman (Director, Anti-Defamation League) all have in common
other than trashing former Nebraska Senator Chuck Hagel in an effort to derail
his potential nomination as Secretary of Defense?
Answer:
unlike Chuck Hagel, none of them have ever donned a uniform let alone shed a drop of blood or even a bead of sweat, in defense of this nation!
Sergeant
Hagel was leading troops in combat as a 9th Infantry Division Infantry Squad
Leader in Vietnam (67-68) and earning the Combat Infantryman Badge, two Purple
Hearts, the Army Commendation Medal and the Vietnamese Cross of Gallantry among
other decorations, before many of his critics were even born although some like
Foxman, Kristol and several others were certainly of an age where they were
eligible to serve with Sergeant Hagel if they had had the guts.
There are still enough metal shards
from a Viet Cong mine embedded in Hagel’s chest that he sets off metal
detectors in airports and the scars on the left side of his face from another
mine explosion a month later can scare young children. His younger brother Tom
was assigned to his squad and the first time Chuck was struck by shrapnel it
was his brother Tom that stopped the
bleeding and saved his life. During that second mine attack a month later, the
roles were reversed and Chuck rescued Tom
who was knocked unconscious in the explosion. Seems heroism runs in his family
and his father was even a WWII Vet. Once
confirmed, Chuck Hagel will be the first Secretary of Defense
with a Purple Heart since Elliot L. Richardson during the Nixon administration.
“Stopping a war is a hell of a
lot harder than starting it, and Chuck understands that,” said Bob Kerrey,
another former Nebraska
senator and Vietnam Medal of Honor recipient. “Sometimes it provokes cries from
the right that he’s soft. But it’s just that he’s experienced it, and it
animates him.” Hagel once told a Library
of Congress Veterans History Project interviewer in 2002: “thinking to myself,
you know, if I ever get out of all of this, I am going to do everything I can
to assure that war is the last resort that we, a nation, a people, calls upon
to settle a dispute. The horror of it, the pain of it, the suffering of it.
People just don’t understand it unless they’ve been through it.”
An independent thinker, Hagel was often uncomfortable at Republican
caucus meetings especially when Vice President Dick Cheney attended, as Cheney
would give “him the hairy eyeball” but hostility from the White House or party
leadership never muted Hagel as his Vietnam experience gave him the boldness to
speak independently. It’s hard to
intimidate a combat veteran by threatening to withdraw a committee assignment. About the only way a Draft Dodger like Cheney
could have hurt Hagel was to give him a paper cut while handing him the meeting
agenda!
Another example of Hagel’s
independence is President Reagan appointed him deputy Veterans Administration administrator
in 1982, but he resigned over a disagreement with his boss, VA Administrator Robert
P. Nimmo. He opposed Nimmo cutting the funding
for VA programs and his referring to veterans groups as "greedy," and
to Agent Orange as not much worse than a "little teenage acne."
Among his defenders and supporters, most of whom are also
former military and often combat vets, is IN Senator (and former Navy Lieutenant)
Richard G. Lugar, a foreign policy mentor to Hagel who is leaving the Senate. Lugar calls Hagel “an excellent candidate”
and predicts “most senators who served with Chuck would be favorable to his
nomination.”
Two top former Republican
defense officials also support Hagel. Former
Bush 43 Deputy Secretary of State (and 3 tour Vietnam Vet and former Navy Lieutenant
Commander) Richard Armitage, says of Hegal “I happen to know the guy. He’s not
owned by anybody, he happens to think for himself, and this apparently causes
some fear in some cases. He’s got an unerring bullshit sensor, he’s got real
stones, and he doesn’t mind telling you what his opinion is, which will stand
him in very good stead in the Pentagon if the president nominates him.”
Retired Air Force Lieutenant General Brent Scowcroft, a
former Ford and Bush 41 National Security Adviser calls Hagel “one of the most
well-respected and thoughtful voices on both foreign and domestic policy. At an
uncertain time in America –
with a significant debt burden, a polarized Congress, and a host of challenges
facing the international community, I am confident Senator Hagel will provide a
vibrant, no-nonsense voice of logic and leadership to the United States .”
Even Washington Post liberal columnist Dana Milbank defended
Hagel in his 18 December column calling Hagel’s pro-Israel legislative record
one which reflects “an infantry sergeant who isn’t opposed to war (he voted for
the conflicts in the Balkans, Afghanistan and Iraq) but knows the grim costs of
going to war without a plan… indicative of a decorated military man who, unlike
some of his neocon critics, knows that military action doesn’t solve
everything.”
Nobody can ever predict how well
a Defense Secretary nominee will perform, case in point Les Aspin, or if Hagel will
be a good manager during this pivotal time in Pentagon history. With the US Afghanistan
combat role ending and budgets shrinking, refereeing the infighting among the
services for resources is going to require all the finesse of an NFL Official. Hagel brings some obvious strengths to the
job. As a Republican and genuine
military hero, he provides the “street cred” for executing the Afghanistan withdrawal that only a combat
veteran can bring and the withdrawal will succeed only if our military leaves
an Afghanistan
that can hold together.
Hagel’s military record is
surely one big plus. Rhode Island Senator
(and former Army Major) Jack Reed says of Hagel “He’s a guy who knows how to
talk to the troops and has walked in their boots. He’s blunt, direct and
impatient with pettifogging. In these traits, he’s similar to the current
secretary, Leon Panetta, and his predecessor, Bob Gates. And like both of them,
Hagel has a temper.”
Hagel will handle the tough,
no-nonsense-boss part of the job with no problem but he’s more blunt than
nuanced and nobody ever called him a defense intellectual so it remains to be
seen how he is at steering Pentagon procurement decisions in this age of
technology and officiating as the Joint Chiefs mud wrestle over budgets. Fortunately, to help him Hagel will have as the
Deputy Secretary Ashton Carter who has a wealth of experience at Defense
including having served as the Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisition,
Technology and Logistics (USD AT&L), the official responsible for procurement
decisions. Hagel will have no problem saying
NO to the Chiefs and their logrolling allies on Capitol Hill and with Carter as
his Deputy and chief operating officer to help, I’m confident he’ll skillfully manage
the complex spending and strategy decisions.
The most formidable obstacle to
his getting the job, that I’m comfortable he’ll successfully negotiate, is the array
of neoconservative journalists who are ganging up against him and trying to
smear him as an anti-Semite despite his votes for the Iran Nonproliferation
Act, the Palestinian Anti-Terrorism Act and the Iran Missile Proliferation
Sanctions Act. He even co-sponsored resolutions opposing any unilateral
declaration of a Palestinian state and praising Israel ’s efforts “in the face of
terrorism, hostility and belligerence by many of her neighbors.” He also co-sponsored
legislation urging the international community “to avoid contact with and
refrain from supporting the terrorist organization Hamas until it agrees to recognize
Israel ,
renounce violence, disarm and accept prior agreements.”
The Right-wing neocon columnist arrayed
against him include the likes of the Wall Street Journal’s Bret Stephens and the
Weekly Standard’s Bill Kristol and they all have that one thing in common I
previously mentioned, unlike Chuck Hagel, none of these chicken hawks have ever donned a uniform
let alone shed any blood or even sweat, in defense of this nation!
As an old infantry sergeant with two Purple Hearts,
Hagel isn’t afraid or opposed to war (he voted for the Balkans, Afghanistan and
Iraq conflicts) but he also knows the horrors of it so would only resort to war as
the last and unavoidable option, unlike his Chicken Hawk neocon critics who “hold
their manhoods cheap whiles any speaks that fought with us upon Saint Crispin's
Day.”