Tuesday, January 24, 2023

True & Accurate Washington Post Comment About Swalwell Hits a Little Too Close to Home for Post Censors

My wife posted the below well sourced and totally true and accurate comment in the Washington Post (WaPo) comments section for this article. Again, the WaPo does not appreciate being challenged, especially if the challenge is backed up by credible sources, so the WaPo Censors immediately replaced my comment with the following: “This commenter has been removed by a moderator for violating our community guidelines.” and here I didn’t even know the WaPo had any standards. 

Regardless, you can read the entire article at the WaPo website at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/01/23/intelligence-committee-schiff-mccarthy-greene-gosar/ and then make up your own mind if this comment offended your delicate eyes and ears.

Jeffries taps Schiff, Swalwell for Intelligence panel; McCarthy vows to block both

This commenter has been removed by a moderator for violating our community guidelines.

Here is EXACTLY what I posted that was so “offensive” to the WaPo censors:

 ==================== Beginning of WaPo Comment ===================

John Wagner and Marianna Sotomayor might fancy themselves “reporters” but by including this passage “Swalwell’s alleged ties to a Chinese intelligence operative — an episode that has produced no evidence of wrongdoing on Swalwell’s part.”without this contradicting information exposes them as DNC hacks just masquerading as WaPo “reporters”:

- There have been allegations reported that Swalwell was sexually involved with a Chinese Communist spy named Fang Fang, andhe “hasn’t denied the reporting.

- Fang was instrumental in the hiring and inserting at least of one Communist Chinese intern into Swalwell's Congressional office while Swalwell was a member of the Intel Committee.

There are “lies of commission” where the WaPo just publishes outright false information or Fake News and “lies of omission” where the WaPo just leaves out important details or pieces of information to mislead readers. The WaPo has proven to be a master of both but this article is an example of one of their “lies of omission.” More confirmation: Democracy Dies in Darkness and the WaPo Is Turning Out the Lights.

==================== End of WaPo Comment ===================


No comments:

Post a Comment