Thursday, November 23, 2023

Trump’s New York Trial Judge Arthur Engoron - Dumb & Dumber

On 12 November 2023 the Washington Post published this Anti-Trump article mostly distorting the evidence to paint Former President Trump in the most unfavorable light but the more astute and informed reader would see through the WaPo smoke screen and come to a different conclusion about Trump’s guilt or innocence than the WaPo intended.

 




Trump defense at New York fraud trial set to counter state attorney general

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/11/12/trump-new-york-fraud-trial-james/

My Blog readers can read the WaPo article for themselves but here below is what my wife and I took away from it and what my wife posted in the article’s comment section. Recall, my Soldiers _Wife now has to do all our posting because The_Old_Soldier_Colonel has a lifetime WaPo commenting ban. It seems the WaPo just censors, deletes and ultimately bans Conservative commenters to avoid WaPo embarrassment from having their errors and biased coverage exposed.  I know this because that is what has happened to me.

https://old-soldier-colonel.blogspot.com/2022/04/why-comments-in-washington-post.html?m=0

^ A_Solders_Wife

What is incredible about this case is how stupid Arthur Engoron, the presiding judge, comes off when he believes Trump “pulled the wool over the eyes” of some of the most sophisticated lenders in the World including his biggest lender, Deutsche Bank, who made millions off Trump. Probably Engoron’s most ignorant ruling is to value Trump’s Mar-a-Largo property at $18 Million. The value of real estate is what a buyer is willing to pay for it but professional Florida appraisers vary in their appraisals between $400 - $600 Million, far closer to Trump’s than Engoron’s estimates.

Here are my take away passages from this article:

> “Patrick Birney … said in court that a top executive told him Trump wanted…” (hearsay anybody ?)

> “Legal analysts and other observers say the testimony has potential shortcomings, including that no employee has testified that Trump ordered the values to be manipulated except for Cohen, who previously admitted to lying under oath and has a well-documented, admitted grudge against Trump.”

> “there is also no trail of records leading directly to Trump ….”

> “Cohen conceded that in February 2019 he told Congress that Trump never actually instructed him and longtime finance chief Allen Weisselberg to doctor his annual net worth reports.…”

> Other witnesses called by James’s side declined to point a finger at Trump. Birney’s testimony largely relieved Trump executives of blame.…”

> “Trump Organization’s biggest lender, Deutsche Bank, made millions off its relationship with the Trumps. Trump’s primary banker there previously said in a deposition that she was unaware of any bad information Trump or the other family members had given to the bank, potentially undermining the idea that the statements had unfairly benefited Trump.”

> “Trump’s defense has argued that there were no victims in the case and nothing illegal occurred.… None of the banks were duped, because they did not rely on the statements to verify Trump’s worthiness as a business partner…

Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Another Instance of the Washington Post Censors Removing Conservative and/or Embarrassing Comments That Expose WaPo Misinformation or Fake News

 




Once again, the WaPo censors were quick to silence my wife with a 10 day suspension from commenting. 

In recent years we have been frequent WaPo commenters gleefully pointing out and correcting their numerous errors but have noticed fewer and fewer comments from Conservative readers have been showing up.  We had assumed that this lack of Conservative comments was attributable to fewer and fewer Conservative WaPo subscribers as the paper kept drifting further and further to the Left and losing readership but recently we have learned otherwise.  It seems the WaPo just censors, deletes and ultimately bans Conservative commenters to avoid WaPo embarrassment from having their errors and biased coverage exposed.  I know this because that is what has happened to my wife with temporary blocking and me with a permanent ban from commenting. For the full story of how arbitrary, capricious and unfair  the WaPo process is, see: https://old-soldier-colonel.blogspot.com/2022/04/why-comments-in-washington-post.html?m=0

Here is what garnered my wife’s latest suspension that just expired this morning (14 Nov 2023). I challenge anyone to see what is so objectionable about this comment that it offended the delicate sensitivities of the WaPo Censors: 


Both “Don the Con” Trump and “Geriatric Joe” Biden are too old and senile to be President but only a Dem fool would even believe 80+ year old “Geriatric Joe” is really running this country today. In fact, he is only a puppet with his de facto junta-presidents/Head Handlers really pulling the strings. They are Chief of Staff Jeff Zients, National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan and Domestic Policy Advisor Neera Tanden. At least we should all Thank God it’s not “Kacklin Kamala” Harris calling the shots. If “Geriatric Joe” were to be re-elected, I can’t imagine how incoherent he will be at 86 when he would still be in office. He would make “Crazy Hoody John” Fetterman almost seem normal. Even worse, if 80+ “Geriatric Joe” were to die in office, “Kackling Kamala” would assume the office of President, now that’s a thought too scary to even imagine.

Anyone that has watched President Biden stumble through reading off a teleprompter or struggle to respond to one of the planted question he only takes has seen for themselves how diminished his mental faculties have become. When he goes off script it’s even worse. Anyone the Republicans or even the No Labels Third-Party put up will destroy him in debates and his handlers 2020 “Hidin Biden in the Basement” strategy won’t work in 2024.

A moderate No Labels slate of outgoing Louisiana governor John Bel Edwards, Arizona Senator Kyrsten Sinema or former Maryland Governor Larry Hogan is beginning to look very good and is probably a better choice than any of the major party losers or even sitting it out.

To demonstrate how impaired “Geriatric Joe” is, my husband has posted a compendium of his tall tales and faux pas in one tight shot group at: https://old-soldier-colonel.blogspot.com/2023/10/geriatric-joe-bidens-tall-tales.html?m=0

Tuesday, October 17, 2023

"Geriatric Joe" Biden's Tall Tales, Misinformation, Blunders & Out Right Lies

Over the years “Geriatric Joe” Biden has become infamous (or rather notorious) for spinning some of the most unbelievable “tall tales” that even Ripley wouldn’t believe so here the Old Colonel has compiled several of his most notable ones in this one tight shot group for your enjoyment.  Although all are outright lies and misinformation, many are harmless exaggerations and fabrications to validate his manhood despite his Draft Dodging during Vietnam to avoid any brush with danger but this first lie was hurtful and damaging to the man involved and his family in what was definitely the most traumatic event in either man’s life.

 

Daughter of man in ’72 Biden crash seeks apology from widowed Senator

·         By CARL HAMILTON
SPECIAL TO THE NEWARK POST

 Oct 30, 2008

https://www.newarkpostonline.com/news/local/daughter-of-man-in-biden-crash-seeks-apology-from-widowed/article_6c9a477e-63be-561b-b771-1330b4cda02d.html

Newark resident Pamela Hamill wants a public apology from vice presidential candidate U.S. Sen. Joseph Biden (D-Del.), who she says has repeatedly besmirched her late father, Curtis C. Dunn.

Dunn was the tractor-trailer driver involved in the December 1972 accident that took the life of the newly-elected U.S. Senator’s first wife, Neilia, and 13-month-old daughter, Naomi.

Dunn died in 1999, but his daughter says she’s fed up with Biden publicly mischaracterizing him as having been drunk when the accident occurred.

According to Delaware Superior Court Judge Jerome O. Herlihy, who oversaw the police investigation 36 years ago as chief prosecutor, there is no evidence supporting Biden’s claim.

“The rumor about alcohol being involved by either party, especially the truck driver (Dunn), is incorrect,” Herlihy said recently.

Police determined that Biden’s first wife drove into the path of Dunn’s tractor-trailer, possibly because her head was turned and she didn’t see the oncoming truck.

Dunn, who overturned his rig while swerving to avoid a collision, ran to the wrecked car and was the first to render assistance.

Police filed no charges against Dunn, who at that time lived in North East, Md. with his wife, Ruby, and their seven children.

Biden has been alluding to alcohol being involved in the crash for nearly a decade. During a speech in 2001, Biden told an audience at University of Delaware that a drunken driver crashed into his family.

He told a similar story during a public appearance in 2007.

More recently, the vice presidential candidate’s misrepresentation of Dunn has found its way into major newspapers, including the New York Times.

It also has been repeated on radio and on television by major news journalists, including CBS anchorwoman Katie Couric.

Yet Hamill said she had no idea Biden had been misrepresenting Dunn until late August.

That’s when “Inside Edition” producers requested an interview with Hamill after the television show’s reporters had gathered evidence contradicting Biden’s story.

Hamill says she defended Biden at first, believing that, perhaps, his words had been misconstrued.

But her disbelief turned to anguish when shown a video of Biden making his unfounded assertion during a public appearance.

Biden told the crowd, “A tractor-trailer, a guy who allegedly — and I never pursued it — drank his lunch instead of eating his lunch, broadsided my family and killed my wife instantly and killed my daughter instantly and hospitalized my two sons …”

“I just burst into tears,” Hamill said. “The story already is tragic enough, why did he have to sensationalize it by saying my father was drunk? My family is outraged.”

Hamill appeared on “Inside Edition” on Sept. 18 to set the record straight and now, acting as family spokesperson, she is campaigning for Biden to recant his story and restore her father’s honor.

On Oct. 1, after several attempts to make contact, Hamill sent a registered letter to Biden’s camp, asking him to tell the truth.

She also asked CBS officials to instruct Katie Couric to broadcast the real circumstances surrounding the fatal accident.

As of Sunday, Hamill hadn’t heard from Biden’s camp.

In an Oct. 21 e-mail, a CBS spokesman acknowledged discrepancies in Biden’s story and explained that he’s awaiting word from the “news people.”

Hamill said learning about Biden’s false portrayal of her late father has chilled warm feelings that she once held for the senator.

In 2001, she wrote a heartfelt letter to Biden expressing her father’s profound grief after hearing Biden make a post Sept. 11 speech in which he told the audience that, given his history, he could empathize with victims.

“Growing up, my dad never talked about it. He always got very solemn around Christmastime because the anniversary was Dec. 18, and he never wanted to celebrate the holidays,” Hamill said. “When newspapers had anniversary articles (about the crash), we hid them from dad.”

Biden responded in a handwritten note, which, in part, reads, “All that I can say is I am sorry for all of us and please know that neither I or my sons feel any animosity whatsoever.”

Hamill says that because she fondly recalled those tender correspondences, the revelation of Biden’s distorted story is even more overwhelming.

“We always felt like our heartstrings were attached to (Biden’s) heartstrings. Now we feel stabbed in the back,” she said.

Hamill wants to clear her late father’s name before Biden’s story is even more widely accepted as fact.

“Suppose he becomes the next vice president,” she said. “Movies could be made about him and books could be written about him, all falsely portraying my father as a drunk driver. We need to set the record straight and clear my father’s name right now before this goes any further.”

… and here is the rest of the story:

In late August of 2008, during the presidential campaign in which Biden was now Barack Obama’s running mate, Inside Edition aired a clip of him talking about the “errant driver who stopped to drink.” The daughter of Curtis C. Dunn, that driver who died in 1999, was distraught. “The family feels these statements are both hurtful and untrue and we didn’t know where they originated from” the daughter, Pamela Hamill, told a reporter from the News Journal in Delaware, “he was a good, hardworking man, and wonderful father.” Her father had mourned the accident, she said, and always was solemn around the holidays because of it.

After CBS News rehashed the debunking in 2009, Biden finally called her. “He apologized for hurting my family in any way,” she said. “So we accepted that—and kind of end of story from there.”

This was very gracious of the Dunn family given Biden had been telling a similar false account of the accident to crowds for years. He would say: “Let me tell you a little story  A tractor-trailer, a guy who allegedly — and I never pursued it — drank his lunch instead of eating his lunch, broadsided my family and killed my wife instantly and killed my daughter instantly and hospitalized my two sons …”  He would say this even though he knew it wasn’t true.

The driver of the truck, Curtis C. Dunn of Pennsylvania, was not charged with drunk driving. He wasn’t charged with anything. The accident was an accident, and though the police file no longer exists, coverage in the newspapers at the time made it clear that fault was not in question. For whatever reason, Neilia Biden, who was holding the baby, ended up in the right of way of Dunn’s truck coming down a long hill.

According to Jerome Herlihy, a retired judge who then was a deputy attorney general and a Biden neighbor who still remains friends with him: “She had a stop sign. The truck driver did not.” Herlihy was asked “to go out to the state police troop where the driver of the other vehicle was to make sure everything was going all right,” so he did. “In the end,” Herlihy said, “I concurred in their decision that there was no fault on his part.”

 


            



FACT CHECKER

Biden loves to retell certain stories. Some aren’t credible.

Analysis by Glenn Kessler The Fact Checker, 31 August 2023 at 1530 EDT

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/08/31/biden-loves-retell-certain-stories-some-arent-credible/

Edited Article Text:

“President Biden, like many politicians, likes to tell stories …. But throughout his career — most famously in his first presidential campaign, in the 1988 election cycle — Biden’s propensity to exaggerate or embellish tales about his life led to doubts about his truthfulness….

The tale of the fire in his house

At least six times as president, mostly recently in comments to Hurricane Idalia victims Wednesday, Biden has exaggerated the extent of a fire that occurred at his house in 2004.

“And I know, having had a house burn down with my wife in it — she got out safely, God willing — that having a significant portion of it burn, I can tell: 10 minutes makes a hell of a difference,” Biden said at an infrastructure event in November 2021.

In March this year, speaking to a firefighters conference, Biden said: “Lightning struck in a pond behind my house, went up underneath the conduit, and caught the — caught fire underneath the floorboards of my house. And it was during the summer. Air conditioning was on. Smoke that thick all three stories.” He added: “My fire company was there to go in and save my wife, get her out; the cat; and my ’67 Corvette.”

Speaking to a summit on fire prevention last October, Biden said: “We almost lost a couple firefighters, they tell me, because the kitchen floor was — the — burning between beams in the house, in addition to almost collapsed into the basement.”

The contemporary news accounts in the Wilmington News Journal and the Associated Press are much less dramatic.

“Biden’s house on Barley Mill Road was reported hit by lightning at 8:16 a.m., emergency officials said,” the News Journal reported. “There were no injuries and firefighters kept the fire contained to one room.” The article added that “firefighters from Cranston Heights, Talleyville, Elsmere, Mill Creek and Hockessin fire companies arrived to find heavy smoke coming from the house.”

Cranston Heights Fire Co. Chief George Lamborn told the newspaper the flames did not spread from the kitchen. “Luckily, we got it pretty early,” he said. “The fire was under control in 20 minutes.”

The tale of the Amtrak conductor

At least 10 times as president, most recently during an Aug. 15 speech in Milwaukee, Biden has told a heartwarming but implausible story about an Amtrak conductor named Angelo Negri who congratulated him for traveling more on Amtrak than he had on Air Force planes as vice president. Biden often brings up the anecdote when discussing infrastructure projects or speaking to labor groups.

Biden’s tale varies slightly in each retelling. In one version, told at a New Jersey Transit facility in October 2021, Biden recalled: “Ang walks up to me and goes, ‘Joey, baby!’ Grabs my cheek. And I thought the Secret Service was going to blow his head off.” Biden said that Negri had read Biden had flown 1.2 million miles as vice president, but Negri calculated he actually had traveled more than 2 million miles on Amtrak. “So, Joey, I don’t want to hear this about the Air Force anymore,” Negri allegedly said.

Often Biden adds: “True story.”

But it’s not possible this conversation took place as Biden describes. Negri and Biden were friends, according to a CNN interview with Negri’s stepdaughter in 2021, and she said Negri “adored” Biden. But Biden did not pass the 1.2 million-mile mark until 2016; Negri retired from Amtrak in 1993, 16 years before Biden became vice president. Negri died in 2014, two years before Biden claims they had this conversation.

In 2009, after Biden became vice president, Esquire described a “Heeeey, Joey baby!” conversation with an unnamed conductor, suggesting Biden may be mixing up Negri with another person.

The tale of the gay men in suits kissing

Three times this year — and at least seven times since 2014 — Biden has told a version, most recently on Aug. 10, of a story about words his father supposedly spoke after a teenage Biden saw two well-dressed men in suits kiss each other in downtown Wilmington in the early 1960s.

“Joey, it’s simple. They love each other,” Biden’s father is said to have remarked.

Biden usually mentions this story when discussing gay issues but there are reasons to be skeptical. Biden depicts a scene that would have been unusual six decades ago. He describes this exchange with his father usually as taking place in 1961. But back then, gay men generally did not kiss in public. Many people regarded homosexuality as deviant. Delaware’s Rehoboth Beach had some bars regarded then as gay-friendly, but that’s not the same as the strait-laced business community in downtown Wilmington.

Moreover, Biden’s story has evolved over time. In 2014, in a New York Times article on his evolution on same-sex marriage, he was the father in the story, speaking to one of his sons. In the article, Biden’s father figures in a different story on a similar theme — forcing a friend to apologize after insulting a gay couple at a Delaware beach. But in 1987, Biden told the Los Angeles Times yet another version — that his father had lectured him after he tried to put off a visit to a gay couple who were strong supporters of the senator and shared an apartment at a Delaware beach.

The tale of his civil rights arrests

Biden had a tangential role in the civil rights movement — The Fact Checker determined that he participated in one walkout at a restaurant and picketed a segregated movie theater — and yet sometimes he has suggested he was arrested for advocating on behalf of Black people.

Four times, including once as president, Biden has suggested he was arrested for standing on the porch with a Black couple who were subject to demonstrations. Sometimes he says that his mother warned him not to go to the protests. “Remember when I told you not to go down there, Honey, because everybody is protesting and you got arrested standing with the family on the porch,” he said his mother told him, in a version he recounted in 2017. (Twice Biden said the police merely brought him back home from the protest after he stood on the porch.)

But when we investigated, the story did not add up. There was a protest of a Black couple who had purchased a house in an all-White area, but it was a neighborhood many miles from the Biden home. Biden instead appears to be referring to a protest that took place outside the home of the real estate agent who was involved in the sale. That was near where he lived as a teenager at the time.

Campaigning for president in 2020, Biden three times claimed he was arrested in South Africa for trying to see Nelson Mandela, who at the time was imprisoned on Robben Island, near Cape Town. When we determined that was false, he amended his statement to say he was “stopped” at the airport while traveling with a congressional delegation — though others on the delegation said that did not happen.

As president, Biden usually just comments that he tried to see Mandela while visiting South Africa. But once he said he almost was arrested. “Only time I almost got arrested was I was trying to go see Nelson Mandela in South Africa and when I was at a civil rights march,” he said at a Democratic National Committee event in September 2022. “That was the only two times. But I didn’t get arrested. They didn’t think I was worth it.”

The tales of a heroic uncle and the family hospital

Besides his father, Biden’s grandfather, uncle and other family members appear as regular characters in his speeches. But some of the stories he tells are not plausible.

Speaking to veterans in December, Biden recalled how his Uncle Frank fought in the Battle of the Bulge during World War II and was awarded the Purple Heart but never received it. He said that after he became vice president in 2009, he arranged to present the medal to his uncle with the rest of the family in attendance. But his uncle, Frank H. Biden, died in 1999, a decade before Biden became vice president. His Official Military Records as does neither his obituary nor tombstone mentions a Purple Heart, awarded when a soldier is killed or wounded while serving….

Twice this year, most recently in the Milwaukee speech, Biden has claimed his grandfather, an oil company executive, “died in the same hospital” just before Biden himself was born there. (In April it was two weeks before, in August it was six days.)

But Biden’s paternal grandfather, Joseph H. Biden, died at Johns Hopkins Hospital on Sept. 26, 1941, according to an obituary. Biden was born at St. Mary’s Hospital in Scranton, Pa., on Nov. 20, 1942, 14 months later. His maternal grandfather, Ambrose Finnegan, did die at St. Mary’s — but in 1957, nearly 15 years later.”

Academic Prowess

"Geriatric Joe" Biden claimed that he had attended law school at Syracuse University on a full academic scholarship and finished in the top half of his law school class, that he had been named the outstanding student in the political science department as an undergraduate at the University of Delaware, and that he had graduated from Delaware with three undergraduate degrees.

In fact, he did NOT have a full academic scholarship, he ranked 76th in his class of 85 and failed a course when he plagiarized a law review article for a paper he wrote, he was NEVER named “outstanding” for anything in college or law school and he graduated from Delaware with just one degree.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1987/09/22/biden-academic-claims-inaccurate/932eaeed-9071-47a1-aeac-c94a51b668e1/

More Biden Whoppers

It’s another day and another fish tale from Joe Biden.

This time, the president falsely claimed in a speech to have personally witnessed the Pittsburgh bridge collapse last January.

He spun his yarn trying to impress his audience; however, he was caught flat-footed by critics.

“A lot of you were with me when I was in Pittsburgh,” Biden told a crowd gathered at a Milwaukee wind turbine manufacturing plant to hear him speak. “By the way, Pittsburgh is a city of bridges – more bridges in Pittsburgh than any other city in America.”

He went on to claim, “I watched that bridge collapse,” adding, “I got there and saw it collapse with over 200 feet off the ground going over a valley. It collapsed. Thank God school was out during the pandemic.”

The 477-foot-long bridge collapsed hours before his speech. The president was not anywhere near the site.

Some on X, formerly known as Twitter, suggested that Biden had lost touch with reality.

“Joe Biden watched a bridge collapse in Pittsburgh. He’s not lying. Lying requires understanding reality and saying something contrary. Sadly, our president lacks a grasp on reality. His head believes he saw it collapse,” one user wrote.

Others accused the president of being an unabashed liar.

Another post opined, “Prolific liar or dementia? Joe Biden tells a lie each day.  Today: Biden claims he witnessed a Pittsburgh bridge collapse.”

Joe Biden Tall Tale Not Isolated Incident – At the Pittsburgh Tree of Life Synagogue – or maybe NOT and Just in His Mind!

Joe Biden has a long history of tall tales.  Although he hasn’t talked about his rides with Paul Bunyan or Pecos Bill, he has come close.

In 2021, Biden was corrected by the executive director of Pittsburgh’s Tree of Life Synagogue for claiming he had visited it.

The synagogue was the site of the horrific 2018 massacre of 11 people by a Neo-Nazi.

“I used to think that hate could be defeated, it could be wiped out. But I learned a long time ago, it can’t. It only hides. It hides. It hides under the rocks. And given any oxygen at all, it comes out. It’s a minority view, but it comes out, and it comes out raging. And it’s been given too much oxygen in the last four, five, seven, 10 years, and it has seen itself, whether it was – I remember spending time at the – you know, going to the – you know, the Tree of Life Synagogue, speaking with the – just –,” Biden said; he didn’t finish the sentence, instead continuing, “It just is amazing these things are happening – happening in America.”

Tree of Life Executive Director Barb Feige told The New York Post that Biden had never been to the synagogue even before he became president.

Biden’s ‘CornPop’ Tale

Biden’s most infamous Pecos Bill tale probably was his claim in 2019 to have confronted a black gang leader in Wilmington, Delaware in 1962 while he was a lifeguard.

“CornPop was a bad dude and he ran a bunch of bad boys,” he said while mimicking a black American accent. “I walked out with the chain. I walked up to my car,” Biden said. “I said: ‘First of all … when I tell you to get off the board, you get off the board, and I’ll kick you out again. But I shouldn’t have called you Esther Williams, I apologize.’”

“But I don’t know if that apology is going to work … “He said OK, closed the straight razor and my heart began to beat again.”

His tale immediately raised skepticism and many in the media refused to accept it as anything other than a fabrication.

Biden has always had a knack for making things up. It’s not a senior thing.

He has been known as a liar as far as 1987.He was forced out of the 1988 presidential campaign because he lied about his law school education and plagiarized Labour leader Neil Kinnock.

A few more Biden whoppers he told during a Pennsylvania campaign swing 17-19 April 2024

Biden’s uncle in World War II

In Scranton, where Biden was born, he told a dramatic World War II story about his uncle Ambrose Finnegan: “He got shot down in an area where there were a lot of cannibals in New Guinea at the time. They never recovered his body.” He blamed cannibalism even more directly in his later Pittsburgh speech claiming Finnegan “got shot down in New Guinea, and they never found the body because there used to be — there were a lot of cannibals, for real, in that part of New Guinea.”

Facts First: Biden’s claim differs from the account provided by the Defense Department. The Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency’s page on Finnegan says this about the 1944 incident: “For unknown reasons, this plane was forced to ditch in the ocean off the north coast of New Guinea. Both engines failed at low altitude, and the aircraft’s nose hit the water hard. Three men failed to emerge from the sinking wreck and were lost in the crash.” This official account, which notes that an additional crew member survived the crash, makes no mention of the plane being shot down or of possible cannibalism; while Biden said the crash happened “in” New Guinea, where there was indeed some cannibalism at the time, the official account notes the men went down in the ocean.

Biden’s earnings

Biden repeated his regular promise that nobody making less than $400,000 per year will pay even a cent more in taxes under his proposals. He then added, “I hope you’re all able to make $400,000. I never did.”

Facts FirstBiden’s “I never did” claim is false. In fact, his presidential salary is $400,000 per year; the joint tax filings of President Biden and first lady Jill Biden showed $619,976 in income last year, $579,514 in 2022 and $610,702 in 2021. In addition, Biden earned millions in 2017 and 2018, when, during his time as a private citizen following his vice presidency, he and Jill Biden signed a lucrative book deal and he delivered paid speeches. The Bidens made $15.6 million in the two years after leaving office The Bidens’ joint tax filings showed a total of about $11 million in 2017 income and about $4.6 million in 2018 income.

Biden’s visits to Iraq and Afghanistan

Biden claimed in “I was in, I think, 36, 38 times in Iraq and Afghanistan as a senator and as a vice president.”

Facts FirstThese figures are false, according to statistics previously released by Biden’s own 2020 presidential campaign. The campaign said in 2019 that Biden had visited Iraq and Afghanistan on a total of 21 occasions, the Washington Post reported at the time. Biden has delivered similar falsehoods about his travel to Iraq and Afghanistan on various previous occasions — including in the 2019 remarks that prompted his campaign to correct the record.

For a Ton of “historical” Biden gaffs, see my 2010 Blog article:

Joe Biden - The Consummate Gaff-mister and Some of My Favorite “Biden-isms”

https://old-soldier-colonel.blogspot.com/2010/10/who-had-worst-week-in-washington-vice.html

Thursday, October 5, 2023

Washington Post Article: "Caring Biden's" Finally Just Got Rid of Their Vicious Dog After He Attacked 11 Secret Service Agents and White House Staff and Put One Agent in the Hospital Almost a Year Ago

 



A second Biden dog, Commander, is banished from White House after biting

By Kelsey Ables and Victoria Bisset October 5, 2023 at 7:35 a.m. EDT

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/10/05/biden-commander-dog-bites-removed/

President Biden’s 2-year-old dog, Commander, has been removed from the White House after the German shepherd bit staffers and Secret Service officers,” the White House said. “The President and First Lady care deeply about the safety of those who work at the White House and those who protect them every day,” …. Commander’s removal follows a number of biting episodes since he was brought to the White House as a puppy in 2021, the most recent of which occurred last week, when the dog bit a Secret Service officer in what was reportedly the 11th known incidence of aggression. Last November, an agent was hospitalized after Commander, unprovoked, bit the person’s arm and thigh ….”

Let me see if I have this right, according to this WaPo article: “Geriatric Joe” and “Dr” Jill so deeply care about the safety of the Secret Service Agents and White Staff that serve them that they let a wild dog loose on them for another eleven (11) months after this vicious creature put a Secret Service Agent in the hospital and had bitten eleven (11) agents and staff members.

If that’s how the Biden’s “care deeply” about people that serve them, I can’t imagine how they treat people they don’t “care deeply” about although we can get some sense of it from how “deeply” they have cared about their seventh grandchild, Navy.

Last Christmas “Geriatric Joe” and “Dr” Jill even left out Hunter's daughter Navy, whom they have never even bothered to meet let alone acknowledge existed, from the White House stocking display. First Lady “Dr” Jill unveiled the White House decorations that featured stockings over the fireplace for each of the six other Biden grandchildren. Even now banished first dog Commander and first cat Willow got a stocking but not granddaughter Navy. This was only one month after Commander attacked and put in the hospital that Secret Service Agent.

The Biden family, including Hunter, have never even seen Navy, though she was born in August 2018 to Lunden Alexis Roberts. Hunter initially denied being Navy's dad, saying he had 'no recollection' of meeting her mother although he dated her for months.  It was only after a DNA test proved Hunter was the father, he finally began paying monthly child support and healthcare for the girl but in the 2019 paternity suit Hunter had also tried to skirt by without supporting his love child, telling a court he had 'significant debt' from his divorce from ex-wife Kathleen. 'I attest that I am unemployed and have had no monthly income since May 2019,' he testified. At the time he was living in a $12,000-a-month Los Angeles rental property, driving a Porsche Panamera and NBC News found Hunter had made $11 million from 2013 to 2018.

Seems “Father & Mother of the Year” “Geriatric Joe” and “Dr” Jill raised a real stand-up guy in that Hunter and they are doing the same “Grandfather & Grandmother of the Year” job with Navy. The “First Family” brings “dysfunctional” to a new level.

For a full account of this touching “Hallmark Channel” First Family Christmas story, hit this link:

https://old-soldier-colonel.blogspot.com/2022/12/did-joe-jill-hunter-biden-just-forget.html


Saturday, September 30, 2023

More Proof the Washington Post Censors Remove Conservative Comments and Embarrassing Comments That Expose WaPo Misinformation or Fake News

 I have previously posted several examples of comments that so offended the sensitive WaPo censors that they felt compelled to immediately remove them but this is the most innocuous one so far that somehow violated the "Washington Post's Community Guidelines" whatever they might be?



Friday, August 18, 2023

BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU WISH FOR, YOU MIGHT JUST GET IT! CHANGES TO THE UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE (UCMJ) GOING INTO EFFECT IN DECEMBER 2023 RAISES THE BAR FOR CHARGING SERVICE MEMBERS WITH SEX CRIMES SO WILL RESULT IN FEWER, NOT MORE, PROSECUTIONS – Which Might Just Be a Good Thing!

 

By Alex Horton, Published 14 August 2023 at 1815 EDT

 Last month, President Biden signed an order implementing bipartisan reforms that, among other things, establish independent military prosecutors to oversee cases involving sexual assault, domestic violence and murder, removing that responsibility from commanders.…

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/08/14/vanessa-guillen-cecily-aguilar/?commentID=89dd3912-fc0f-4d4b-9c68-7b06c566c3b4

Be careful what you ask for, you might just get it. The Military expects that as a result of this change there will be far fewer accused actually charged or brought to Court Martial. In sexual misconduct cases, commanders are much more inclined to charge an accused and let a court adjudge guilt which does result in a high acquittal rate. Military prosecutors are much more concerned with winning and their win-loss stats so only bring “slam dunk” cases to trail and don’t prosecute the tougher cases. Hence, the “close calls” will no longer be brought to Justice.

The change is the biggest reform to the Uniform Code of Military Justice since its creation in 1950, the White House said.” Actually this is incorrect. The biggest chance happened in 1968 when accused got lawyers to represent them in Special Courts. Before then, accused were represented by an officer randomly selected off a duty roster.

Since the UCMJ went into effect on 31 May 1951, the administration of Military justice has been the exclusive responsibility of Commanders so this change taking effect this December which removes from commanders the decision to charge and try a service member for sexual assault and 13 other special victim related crimes is a radical departure from what has been working for the past 72 years. With this change the decision to charge and try these crimes will rest with independent military prosecutors and the net effect will be a drastically reduced number of rape and sexual assault prosecutions.

I entered the Army as a High School Grad Draftee inducted at the Scranton/Wilkes-Barre Pennsylvania MEPS. I tested out high enough to be offered the opportunity to attend Officers Candidate School (still carrying my Draftee US serial number) and after commissioning I went to Vietnam as a new Second Lieutenant.  I extended in Vietnam to come home a decorated Captain with a CIB and stayed in the Army retiring after 30 years as a Full Colonel/06.  During my 30 years in the service I Commanded Four Companies, was the Executive Officer of a Combat Battalion, Commanded a Divisional Combat Battalion on the DMZ in Korea and Commanded at the Brigade level so I had a Ton of time with troops. Because I was a Court Martial Convening Authority, I attended the Senior Officers Legal Course at the Army Judge Advocate General (JAG) School on campus at the University of Virginia Law School in Charlottesville, Virginia. My point is I have had extensive experience melting out Military Justice and supervising subordinate Commanders as they executed their responsibilities disciplining troops.

Uniform prosecution standards also would forever put to rest the military’s traditional practice of using the less rigorous standard of probable cause to refer a case to court-martial. Over the last decade, the probable cause referral standard has likely been the culprit for the low conviction rate in sexual assault cases in the armed forces. Additionally, the military is the only jurisdiction in the United States of America that uses probable cause (the standard of proof to obtain a warrant) to refer a case to a felony level trial where the burden of proof is beyond a reasonable doubt. The probable cause standard to refer a case to court-martial has allowed military sexual assault prosecutions for years. As military lawyers with established independent offices charged with prosecuting special victim crimes, it might adopt the principles of prosecution as stringent as the Department of Justice. If its prosecutors across all services use the heightened referral standards, it will result in a significant reduction in the number of victims being able to confront their violators or having their day in court.  Although most commanders were already referring most credible allegations to Court Martial, they were also following orders contained in these Federal Statutes.

1.    Commanding Officers were told in NDAA-14 that all sexual assault cases should be referred for courts-martial. Such a provision essentially replaces a presumption of innocence with a presumption of probable cause.

2.    Commanding Officers were told in NDAA-14 that a failure to maintain a healthy “command climate” (aka high referral rate for sexual assault allegations) will be relieved of their post.

3.    The statute of limitation for sex offenses was lengthened.

4.    Sexual Assault Prevention and Response training sessions for service members ignore presumption of innocence by teaching “start by believing” and “never question the victim.”

5.    “Victim-centered investigation” models teach investigators to “believe the victim” and not question inconsistencies in the complainant’s story, which it attributes to trauma and not deception. This approach negates the opportunity for a fair and impartial investigation.

Although sexual assault is a grave concern, Congress first over-reacted by forcing Commanding Officers to pursue criminal charges in every case regardless of the merit of the allegations.  As a result of the over-charging, data shows that acquittal rates for sex offenses between 2012 and 2014 were very high. Rather than modifying Congressional mandates, the Congressional and the Presidential solution was to remove jurisdiction for administering Military Justice from Commanders where it had been for at least 70+ years.

The answer was not to make it easier for prosecutors to convict, but to improve the investigation process to produce reliability of results.

the Defense Advisory Committee on Investigation, Prosecution, and Defense of Sexual Assault in the Armed Forces (DAC-IPAD) released a report in October 2020 exploring the astounding number of sexual assault cases that are referred to trial without sufficient admissible evidence to obtain a conviction. The committee argues that this serious problem has significant negative implications for the accused, the victim, and the military justice process. So Congress first created the situation and rather than fixing it removed Commanders from the problems.  Remember, it’s the Commander that is responsible for maintaining good order and discipline in their unit and pays the price if they fail to so it.

 

When the public sees a military sexual assault case go to trial with insufficient evidence, it sends a message that this is a political prosecution, not one based on evidence. This creates the impression that the military will take any case to trial, degrading confidence in legitimate cases that actually have enough evidence.

Here is what one universally respected expert in Military Law had to say about the subject:

The Military takes tough sexual assault cases to trial. That's why its conviction rate is low.

Everyone wants nothing more than to see the eradication of sexual assault from the military and society. But not at the expense of constitutional rights.

If you are an outsider only loosely familiar with the concept of “sexual assault in the military,” then you may be susceptible to what seem to be altruistic proposals from advocacy groups and senators looking to change the laws surrounding sexual assault in our armed forces. But as a career military justice practitioner, both on the prosecutorial and defense sides, I would caution you to look closely at any proposals put forth to determine if they will actually prevent or reduce sexual assault in the military, or adjudicate the cases in a more “fair” manner.

If you have a low conviction rate in particular types of cases, the overarching reason should be pretty obvious — you’re taking close cases to trial. This is precisely the military’s formula. So, instead of telling certain alleged victims of sexual assault that their cases cannot be prosecuted (or will likely result in an acquittal), the military takes a wide swath of sexual assault cases to trial that vastly span the spectrum when it comes to evidentiary strength. That has yielded an acquittal rate of nearly 93% in recent years.

Transferring disposition authority from commanders to career prosecutors in all likelihood will not increase the number of sexual assault prosecutions. But I am hopeful that, if passed, it will yield prosecutorial decisions that are solely evidence-based, without direct command influence. This model will relatedly result in higher conviction rates (if that’s actually a goal). But Congress and advocacy groups may still be unappeased because reports of sexual assault will continue to rise, with lower prosecution rates.

And while the constitutional rights of a person accused of a crime may not be in vogue in the current cultural environment, that does not make them any less critical. The presumption of innocence, burdens of proof, due process, fair trials, competent representation and the like are only buzz words until you’re the one with your actual freedom on the line.

When members of Congress bemoan the low conviction rates in military sex assault cases, what they are saying is this: Without analyzing the specific facts and circumstances of each and every case or sitting through the trials, I believe that these people were wrongfully found not guilty in a court of law that afforded these military members the same constitutional rights as anyone brought to justice in this country.

 

Opinion: Uniform standards needed now for sexual assault prosecution offices

By Meghan Tokash and Paul Grimm   3 July 2023

A gavel rests on the judge’s bench in the courtroom of the 39th Air Base Wing legal office at Nov. 14, 2019, at Incirlik Air Base, Turkey. (Staff Sgt. Joshua Magbanua/Air Force)

The United States military is this year executing the most historic and transformative change to military justice since the creation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice in 1950. On Dec. 28, 2023, the decision to charge and try a service member for sexual assault and 13 other special victim related crimes will be removed from commanders and will rest in the hands of independent military prosecutors. The offices housing these specialized litigators became fully operational on July 1, 2023.

But the secretary of defense has one crucial outstanding task left: create uniform prosecution standards across all the services, which he can do with a stroke of a pen. This final action — or failure to act — could make or break the success of the independent special victim’s prosecution offices.

In 2021, service members past and present raised their voices to the Independent Review Commission on Sexual Assault in the Military. They identified the command-driven justice system as a perpetrator of broken trust for survivors and criminally accused navigating the military justice landscape. The secretary of defense and the Congress listened.

On Dec. 28, 2021, the historic legislation removing commanders from prosecuting special victim cases became law. On July 1, the new Offices of Special Trial Counsel, or OSTC, in the Department of the Navy, the Army, and the Air Force made their groundbreaking debut.

On June 9, 2023, after five years of rigorous study, data collection, and stakeholder engagement, the Defense Advisory Committee on the Investigation, Prosecution, and Defense of Sexual Assault in the Armed Forces, or DAC-IPAD, released a report to the secretary of defense and Congress recommending Secretary Lloyd Austin revise Appendix 2.1 of the MCM to establish uniform prosecution standards that align with the prosecution principles contained in the United States Justice Manual.

In its report, the DAC-IPAD included a proposal to create a statement of prosecutorial practices and policies that every judge advocate can use when exercising prosecutorial discretion. The proposed prosecution standards provide that counsel for the government refer charges to a court-martial only if they believe that the service member’s conduct constitutes an offense under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, or UCMJ, and that the admissible evidence will probably be sufficient to obtain and sustain a conviction when viewed objectively by an unbiased fact finder.

This is not a radical idea — in fact, admissible evidence to obtain and sustain a conviction is the gold standard used by prosecutors across the United States Department of Justice. Presently, the military uses the much lower standard of probable cause to send a case to trial and that is not the industry standard.

The DAC-IPAD is comprised of current and former United States district court judges, a state circuit court judge, a former clerk of court for federal bankruptcy court, federal and state prosecutors, a defense appellate counsel, the federal public defender for Washington, D.C., a nationally recognized criminologist, the nation’s top forensic nurse examiner, a former Department of Defense general counsel, a former DoD associate deputy general counsel, a deputy assistant secretary at the Department of Education, and the executive director of the National Crime Victim Law Institute. Many committee members have prior military service as judge advocates (including these two authors who both served as Army judge advocates) and have the expertise and judicial prowess to underwrite such a recommendation that elevates the referral standard.

This policy detail is essential, and timing is everything.

Presently, the military does not have uniform standards to properly guide its prosecutors and each OSTC is writing its own so-called “business rules” that will detail how judge advocates screen, charge, and refer cases. Shrouded in a veil of secrecy, these “rules” are deemed “pre-decisional” by the Pentagon so the public has had no visibility, input, or oversight of their development.

If the secretary of defense does not move swiftly, each service may create different standards governing prosecutorial decision-making. Uniform prosecution standards issued by the secretary of defense would assure service members that criminal cases are being evaluated consistently to avoid charging disparities and unfavorable trial outcomes for both victims and accused.

Uniform prosecution standards also would forever put to rest the military’s archaic practice of using the less rigorous standard of probable cause to refer a case to court-martial. Over the last decade, the probable cause referral standard has likely been the culprit for the abysmal conviction rate in sexual assault cases in the armed forces. Additionally, the military is the only jurisdiction in the United States of America that uses probable cause (the standard of proof to obtain a warrant) to refer a case to a felony level trial where the burden of proof is beyond a reasonable doubt. The probable cause standard to refer a case to court-martial has plagued military sexual assault prosecutions for years. As the military professionalizes lawyers in its ranks with the establishment of independent offices charged with prosecuting special victim crimes, it must also adopt uniform principles of prosecution on par with the Department of Justice. And its prosecutors across all services should use the heightened referral standard of admissible evidence to obtain and sustain a conviction.

Secretary Austin need only adopt the DAC-IPAD’s proposal contained in Appendix G of its newly released report. The proposed standards provide military prosecutors policies and practices that promote the reasoned exercise of prosecutorial authority that will contribute to the fair, evenhanded administration of the UCMJ. Furthermore, the promulgation of these standards by Secretary Austin will establish trust that important prosecutorial decisions will be made rationally and objectively based on an individualized assessment of the facts and circumstances of each case. Establishing the rules now and making them uniform sends a message to sexual assault victims, those criminally accused, and the American public that the military’s new prosecutorial offices will abide by policy designed to prevent unwarranted preferral and referral disparities — both actual and perceived.

The implementation of independent special victim prosecution offices is imminent. The policy guiding these new offices must ensure uniformity, reliability, and consistency that is vital to any prosecutorial function. Without uniform guidance from the secretary, each OSTC may have conflicting standards for screening cases, preferring charges, and referring cases to trial. Worse, prosecutors within each service’s OSTC could use different standards for exercising prosecutorial discretion. Disparate case outcomes will only exacerbate the problem of broken trust in the military’s handling of sexual assault cases. Without uniform prosecution standards, a decade’s effort at military justice reform and the success of the independent special victim prosecution offices will be in jeopardy.

The Hon. Paul Grimm is a retired United States district court judge and professor of the practice of law and director of the Bolch Judicial Institute at Duke Law SchoolMeghan Tokash is a federal prosecutor with the Department of Justice and served as a commissioner on the Secretary of Defense’s Independent Review Commission on Sexual Assault in the Military. When she was an active duty Army judge advocate, Ms. Tokash served as Gen. Austin’s senior trial counsel for U.S. Forces-Iraq from 2010-2011.

Both Judge Grimm and Ms. Tokash are members of the Defense Advisory Committee on the Investigation, Prosecution, and Defense of Sexual Assault in the Armed Forces. Their opinions are their own and not those of the full DAC-IPAD, the Department of Justice or the Duke Law School.


28 July 2023

President Biden to Sign Executive Order Implementing Bipartisan Military Justice Reforms

WHITE HOUSE RELEASE

Today, President Biden will sign an Executive Order to implement historic, bipartisan military justice reforms that significantly strengthen how the military handles sexual assault cases. The Executive Order transfers key decision-making authorities from commanders to specialized, independent military prosecutors in cases of sexual assault, domestic violence, murder, and other serious offenses by amending the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).

These changes, which implement reforms passed by Congress in the Fiscal Year 2022 National Defense Authorization Act (FY22 NDAA), represent the most significant transformation of the military justice system since the UCMJ was established in 1950. The historic reforms announced today will better protect victims and ensure prosecutorial decisions are fully independent from the chain of the command. They follow decades of tireless efforts by survivors, advocates, and Members of Congress, to strengthen the military justice system’s response to gender-based violence and build on recommendations from the Independent Review Commission on Sexual Assault in the Military (IRC), which Secretary Austin established at President Biden’s direction as one of his earliest acts in office.

These reforms are a turning point for survivors of gender-based violence in the military. They fulfill President Biden’s promise to fundamentally shift how the military justice system responds to sexual assault and related crimes, which is something President Biden has prioritized since Day One of this administration. Ending gender-based violence wherever it occurs has been a top priority for the President throughout his career—as a Senator, and as Vice President. As Commander in Chief, he’s made clear that our one truly sacred obligation as a nation is to prepare and equip those we send into harm’s way, and to care for them and their families both while they are deployed and when they return home. The reforms implemented through today’s Executive Order do just that, promoting dignity and respect for those who serve by better protecting our servicemembers and making the military safer and more just.

Today’s Executive Order takes important action to reform our military justice system by amending the Manual for Courts-Martial and its accompanying Rules for Courts-Martial including by:

·         Establishing the rules that will govern the new Offices of Special Trial Counsel (OSTC), the independent military prosecutors who will now decide, in the place of commanders, whether to prosecute covered offenses such as sexual assault and domestic violence, child abuse, and murder;

·         Making clear that prosecutorial decisions made by special trial counsel are binding and fully independent from the chain of command;

·         Delineating the relationship and authorized interactions between special trial counsel and commanders to protect the independence of special trial counsel;

·         Modernizing procedures to better protect victims and promote fairness before, during and after court-martial proceedings;

·         Reforming the court-martial sentencing system to promote uniformity and fairness, as recommended by the IRC, to reduce disparities in sentencing in cases of rape and sexual assault; and

·         Creating a uniform evidence standard for non-judicial punishment actions, which the IRC highlighted as critical to make consistent across the military services given that most sexual misconduct cases are handled by nonjudicial punishment rather than courts-martial.

This month also marks two years since the IRC published its final report, outlining recommendations to improve accountability, prevention, climate and culture, and victim care and support. Today’s Executive Order advances the IRC’s core accountability recommendations and builds on the progress that has already been made by the Department of Defense in implementing the IRC’s more than 80 recommendations, including:

·         Establishing the Offices of Special Trial Counsel. In July 2022, with direction from Secretary Austin, the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force, including the Space Force, established and staffed their OSTCs to assume authority for prosecutorial decisions for covered offenses including sexual assault and domestic violence at the end of 2023. Beginning January 1, 2025, special trial counsel prosecutorial authority will expand to include sexual harassment cases.

·         Hiring, Training, and Empowering the Prevention Workforce. Consistent with the IRC’s recommendation to establish a dedicated prevention workforce with public health expertise, the Department of Defense launched a phased approach to hiring a primary prevention workforce with 2,000 skilled professionals who will promote the health of their military community and work with leaders to change policies and implement prevention activities. In December 2022, the Department of Defense released guidance for this new workforce, and hiring and onboarding is underway at installations around the world.

·         Strengthening and Professionalizing the Sexual Assault Response Workforce. The Department of Defense, in collaboration with the Military Services and National Guard has adopted a comprehensive approach to restructuring, professionalizing, strengthening, and resourcing for the sexual assault response workforce. This includes moving Sexual Assault Response Coordinators (SARCs) and Victim Advocates (VAs) from the command reporting structure, and generally eliminating collateral duty for SARCs and VAs.  This standardized approach across the Department of Defense is nearing completion.

·         Improving the Military’s Response to Domestic Violence and Sexual Harassment. Recognizing sexual assault can overlap with other forms of gender-based violence, the IRC recommended ways to improve accountability and support to survivors of domestic violence and sexual harassment. The Administration has:

o    Reissued and revised the Defense Department’s domestic abuse policy in December 2021. Key updates include expanding eligibility for Sexual Assault Prevention and Response program services to domestic violence survivors who have experienced sexual assault;

o    Tracked the prevalence of domestic abuse/intimate partner-related sexual assault by collecting information on the victim-perpetrator relationship in the Workplace and Gender Relations Surveys of Active-Duty Members (WGRA), and Workplace and Gender Relations Surveys of Reserve Component Members (WGRR);

o    Expanded victim advocate services, reporting options and support to survivors of sexual harassment, through new guidance issued by the Department of Defense in September 2022. This guidance has been implemented across all Military Departments;

o    Starting with the Navy and the Marine Corps, issued policies for the independent investigation of sexual harassment reports, moving these investigations outside the chain of command of both the individual reporting sexual harassment and the alleged offender. The Department of Defense is working to develop a comprehensive approach to address this issue across all Military Departments; and

o    Amended the Manual for Courts-Martial through an Executive Order in January 2022 that established sexual harassment as a specific offense under the UCMJ, strengthening the military justice response in prosecuting cases of domestic violence, and implementing changes to the UCMJ to criminalize the wrongful broadcast or distribution of intimate visual images.


26 JANUARY 2022

Executive Order, 2022 Amendments to the Manual for Courts-Martial

white HOUSE RELEASE

Today, President Biden signed an Executive Order to amend the Uniform Code of Military Justice, which is key to advancing the historic, bipartisan military justice reform he signed into law last month through the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).

This Executive Order strengthens the military justice system’s response to gender-based violence, and delivers on key recommendations from the Independent Review Commission on Sexual Assault in the Military (IRC) that Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin launched in March 2021.

This year’s NDAA also included key components of the I Am Vanessa Guillén Act, which honors the memory of Army Specialist Vanessa Guillén, whose experience with severe sexual harassment was followed by her brutal murder, drawing national attention to the scourge of sexual violence in the military.  The Guillén family’s leadership and determination in advocating for change underscored the need for military justice reform, including how the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) addresses sexual harassment. The Executive Order that the President signed today establishes sexual harassment as a specific offense under the UCMJ. It also strengthens the military justice response in prosecuting cases of domestic violence, and fully implements changes to the military justice code to criminalize the wrongful broadcast or distribution of intimate visual images. 

As this Executive Order goes into effect today, we reaffirm our commitment to advancing the military justice reform that the President signed into law as part of the NDAA, which includes the historic shift of legal decisions from commanders to independent, specialized prosecutors in cases of sexual assault, domestic violence, and other serious crimes.  And we honor the courage and leadership of the many survivors and advocates who long fought for these critical changes. 

President Biden has long been committed to ending domestic violence, sexual assault, and other forms of gender-based violence, first as a United States Senator, then as Vice President, and now as President and Commander-in-Chief.  These efforts have become even more critical during the COVID-19 pandemic, as risk for gender-based violence has increased in the United States and around the world.  The important steps we have taken today build on the ongoing efforts of the Biden-Harris Administration to address gender-based violence, wherever it occurs, including by directing $1 billion in supplemental funding through the American Rescue Plan for domestic violence and sexual assault prevention and services, andsigning into law the Amendments to the Victims of Crime Act (VOCA), resulting in an increase of hundreds of millions of dollars of non-taxpayer funding for lifesaving services to crime victims around the country. Today’s Executive Order also reinforces the commitments of the Biden-Harris Administration to supporting survivors by releasing the first-ever National Strategy on Gender Equity and Equality in the United States, which identifies gender-based violence prevention and response as a core strategic priority for President Biden. The strategy also names military justice reform as an essential component of elevating gender equality in security processes.

Today marks another turning point for survivors of gender-based violence in the military.  Moving forward, the Administration will continue to advance prevention, promote safe and respectful military climates, and strengthen care and support for survivors.