Wednesday, November 30, 2022

Washington Post White House Christmas Decoration Article - WaPo Censors Tolerate Ugly Comments about Melania Trump but Promptly Delete Anything Not Flattering about "Doctor" Jill Biden, Especially About Her First Marriage



STYLE

Jill Biden’s holiday decorations strike a homier note than Melania Trump’s

Students’ self-portraits, handwritten recipe cards and yes, the Bidens’ pets, play a starring role in this year’s White House decorations

By Jura Koncius and Jada Yuan  November 28, 2022 at 3:31 p.m. EST

https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/2022/11/28/white-house-holiday-decorations-2022/

This article ran in the Washington Post extolling the virtues of First Lady Jill Biden but in typical WaPo fashion the ultra-Leftist WaPo writers (the WaPo doesn’t employ any reporters or journalists anymore) couldn’t resist getting a few digs like this one about the Trumps and especially Melania:

“For their second Christmas in the White House, Biden continued her aim for a homier, more approachable decoration style than her predecessor, Melania Trump. The East Colonnade, known during Trump’s time as the spooky corridor of blood red trees, ….”

Of course this attracted several typical uncouth WaPo Leftist Trump-Haters to post some very ugly comments in the article’s comments section calling Melania a former “escort” a “call girl” and every other vile epithet you can imagine.  Of course the WaPo did not bother to delete these vile comment as “violating Washington Post standards” so in response to one of these ugly comments I posted the below comment suggesting “Doctor” Jill might have a few warts of her own.  The comment was completely accurate and sourced with a link provided but the WaPo deleted this comment in record time as “violating their community standards.”  Seems for the WaPo censors Melania Trump is fair game for any unflattering remarks commenters want to make about her but anything equally disparaging about “Doctor” Biden violates WaPo Standards (and here I didn’t know the WaPo had any “standards”).  Here below is the comment I made and you decide for yourself if it was fair, accurate and as disparaging as, in essence, calling Former First Lady MelaniaTrump a prostitute?

The Comment the WaPo censors removed:

Are we talking about that “pillar of virtue” Jill Stevenson Biden, the one her first husband, Bill Stevenson, accuses of adultery with Joe while he was still married to him. He claims Jill and Joe's relationship actually started in 1974, when he was still married to Jill. Her ex-husband gave an interview to Inside Edition where he said “I was betrayed by the Bidens, Joe was my friend. Jill was my wife.”

According to Stevenson, both he and Jill first got to know Joe Biden when Biden was a county councilman in New Castle, Delaware. “We got married in '70, I introduced Joe to Jill in ‘72.” That would be three years before Biden says was his first date with Jill.

Then one day, Stevenson says a man came into his bar and asked him to pay damages for a fender bender that involved Jill. He looks at me and he says, ‘Oh, she wasn't driving.’ I said, 'Her beloved Corvette, she wasn't driving it?’ He goes, 'Senator Biden was driving it.’ And I went, ‘What?’” Stevenson said. 

Stevenson said he confronted Jill at the time, but “she didn’t say anything” and “just looked at me. I said, ‘You gotta go. You gotta go get your own place,’” Stevenson said. Jill and Stevenson's divorce decree was issued in May 1975. Jill wanted half Stevenson’s business but the judge gave her nothing. What does that tell you?

Seem Jill Biden and Melania Trump might have a lot more in common than people realize.

https://www.insideedition.com/jill-biden-denies-ex-husbands-claim-she-had-affair-with-joe-biden-before-they-split-61971?amp 

Jill Biden unsuccessfully sought half-ownership of The Stone Balloon, a popular college bar owned by her first husband Bill Stevenson, during their 1975 divorce. While she claimed involvement in the business, she did not receive ownership, reportedly because the court did not grant her request for 50% of the bar. 

Background: Jill and Bill Stevenson married in 1970 and divorced in 1975.

The Claim: During the divorce proceedings, she sought a 50% stake in the bar, which Stevenson had opened.

Outcome: The request was denied, and Stevenson retained ownership of the establishment. In his filings, Stevenson accused his wife of infidelity with Joe Biden as the ground for not to award her any stake in the bar.



 




Joe and Jill Biden's 'Affair' Allegations Resurface After Her Ex-Husband Bill Stevenson's Wife Was Found Dead Following 'Domestic Dispute Call' at Delaware Home

HALEY GUnn 31 Dec 2025

https://radaronline.com/p/joe-biden-jill-affair-resurfaces-ex-husband-bill-stevenson-wife-linda-death/

Jill and Bill had been married since February 1970 and lived in Newark, Delaware. Bill opened a popular bar and music venue, The Stone Balloon, close to the University of Delaware campus, where Jill was finishing her degree.


The marriage soured by 1974, and the couple separated. During their contentious divorce, Jill unsuccessfully fought for part ownership of The Stone Balloon. The divorce was finalized in May 1975, two months after Jill and Joe claimed they had their first date in March.

But Bill remembered things differently – and accused the Bidens of lying about when they met in a previous interview with local outlet WDEL.


Bidens Deny Bill's Allegations

The Bidens branded Bill's allegations as 'fictitious' and accused him of trying to 'promote a book.'MEGA

The Bidens branded Bill's allegations as 'fictitious' and accused him of trying to 'promote a book.'MEGA

"I said, 'Look, the Bidens made up this dramatic story that they met, he saw a picture of her,' and I told him, I said, 'That was so untrue,'" Bill told the outlet. "There's probably 500 people in Delaware that saw Joe Biden and Jill at three major fundraising events at The Stone Balloon in 1972, after The Stone Balloon opened in February."


"One thing I do not want to do, and I know this might sound funny to people, is that I don't want to hurt her chances of becoming first lady of the United States – that's not my goal," Bill continued. "I would say to Jill, 'Listen, you know how I feel about this. You had an affair. You worked on the campaign.'"


"Why you invented this crazy story on Oprah Winfrey (that) he saw your picture in the train station – there's too many people that knew we worked on his campaign in 1972," he added.

Sunday, November 6, 2022

Washington Post Editorial: Unethical Architect of the Capitol and the WaPo “Lie of Omission”

The Sunday/6 Nov 2022 Washington Post had an editorial with this headline:


THE POST'S VIEW

Opinion
Another Trump appointee provides a lesson in ethical misconduct


My wife took umbrage with this WaPo “cheap shot” and listed in a comment Blanton’s impressive technical and educational credentials showing he was more than qualified to be the Architect of the Capitol. The WaPo obviously did not appreciate having their “lie of omission” exposed so removed her comment and replaced it with this:

“This commenter has been removed by a moderator for violating our community guidelines.”

Would WaPo readers like to know what the comment was that was removed and replaced with that comment? Here it is and you decide for yourself if the WaPo “community guideline” violated was pointing out the WaPo was guilty of misleading readers by implying Blanton was unqualified for the job.

Removed Comment;
I agree Blanton has acted inappropriately and should be fired but the WaPo is dishonestly implying Mr. Blanton was technically not qualified to be the Architect of the Capitol in the first place.

Blanton earned his Master of Science from the Virginia Tech in Ocean Engineering and his Bachelor of Science in Aerospace, Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering from the United States Naval Academy. He is a Licensed Professional Engineer in Civil Engineering and a Certified Energy Manager. He served in the Navy Civil Engineer Corps for 22 years managing billions of dollars worth of construction, facilities maintenance and general engineering projects.

When it comes to qualifications, Blanton is possibly the most technically qualified professional to hold the position in the last hundred years. Implying a Licensed Professional Engineer in Civil Engineering and a Certified Energy Manager is not qualified to be the Architect of the Capitol is like saying a heart surgeon is not qualified to give a flu shot but the WaPo intentionally omitted his qualifications. Instead, they gave the impression he was not technically qualified for the position. That is the quintessential “lie by omission

A Certified Professional Engineer (PE) is a little more than just an architect, a PE includes everything an architect needs to know and the ability to actually build the pretty structure the architect drew but has no idea if it’s even technically feasible or buildable.

There are “lies of commission” where the WaPo just publishes outright false information or Fake News and “lies of omission” where the WaPo just leaves out important details or pieces of information to mislead viewers. The WaPo has proven to be a master at both but this article is an excellent example of a “lie of omission.”

As a Civil Engineer PE he is far more qualified in the areas required for the position than anyone with the far less technical ARE but the WaPo intentionally omitted this. Instead, they gave the impression he was not technically qualified for the position. That is the quintessential “lie of omission.”

Saturday, November 5, 2022

Contrary to House Whip Congressman Clyburn’s Revisionist History, Hitler NEVER Won Any German Election

House Whip James Clyburn’s made this comment in a Tuesday/3 November NBC News interview in which he noted that he previously cited the rise of Hitler while discussing America’s political climate, according to the outlet. 

“Adolf Hitler was elected chancellor of Germany. And he went about the business of discrediting institutions to the point that people bought into” it,” the South Carolina congressman said, according to NBC. “Nobody would have believed it now. But swastikas hung in churches throughout Germany. We had better be very careful.”

https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/20/politics/james-clyburn-trump-hitler-comparison

Clyburn described the up coming elections with Republicans likely capturing both Houses of Congress as the demise of democracy and likened it to the election of Hitler. The only problem with Clyborn’s analogy is Hitler was never elected to any office in Germany. In the 1932 election for President, Hitler was soundly defeated by the incumbent, Field Marshall Hindenburg. To form a government, Hindenburg APPOINTED Hitler Chancellor and when Hindenburg died in office in August 1934, Hitler seized power, combined the president and chancellor positions into the Fuhrur position, and appointed himself as sole ruler of Germany.  The rest is history.  Representative Clyburn really ought to learn history before he tries to use it to make his point.

Tuesday, November 1, 2022

Washington Post Headline: Biden quietly but clearly prepares a potential reelection bid & Old Soldier’s Comment

Biden quietly but clearly prepares a potential reelection bid

The president and his wife have been meeting with a small group of advisers to pave the way for a 2024 campaign

Here is how this Old Soldier reacted to and commented on this WaPo article;

Anyone that has recently watched President Biden stumble through reading off a teleprompter or struggle to respond to one of the planted question he only takes has seen for themselves how diminished his mental faculties have become. When he goes off script it’s even worse. DeSantis will destroy him in debates and his handlers 2020 “Hidin Biden in the Basement” strategy won’t work in 2024.

Seems Biden now has “Handlers” for governing and “orderlies” to care for his personal needs like changing his “Depends.” Americans deserve to know who are the “head handlers” shadow Presidents really making decisions. Biden is simply the useful fool they roll out to stumble through reading off a teleprompter whatever his Handlers have loaded into it. I suspect the "Head Handlers" really pulling the strings are National Security Advisor, Jake Sullivan and Chief of Staff Ron Kline. Thank God it’s not “Kackling Kamala” Harris calling the shots. Regardless, the American people deserve to know who is really running the country.

Here are Biden’s Recent Brain Farts:
Biden says he 'spoke to' man who 'invented' insulin, who died before Biden was born.

Biden says inflation caused by war in Iraq, says he misspoke because that's where 'my son died'

This link lets you see the unedited Biden gaff when MSNBC Capehart asked him about how Jill felt about him running again in 2024. He either fell asleep or zoned out until Capehart woke him up.https://video.foxnews.com/v/6314192758112 

Other recent brain farts were him talking about “all 54 States” and he even thought he had gotten his illegal Student Loan Forgiveness boondoggle passed by Congress “by a vote or two.” He didn’t remember he did it by Executive Order.


Biden Says He Awarded Uncle A Purple Heart—But His Story Isn’t Possible


President Joe Biden appeared to make another major gaffe when he claimed that after being elected vice president in 2008, he awarded his uncle, Frank Biden, a Purple Heart for his service in World War II, but there are some major holes in his story--primarily the fact his uncle died almost a decade before the 2008 election. Also, there is NO record of his uncle ever being injured while in the Army let alone wounded and awarded a Purple Heart.

Monday, October 10, 2022

Biden = Carter 2.0 or “Are You Better Off Today Than you Were Two (2) Years Ago?”

Reagan (R) beat Carter (D) in November 1980 by asking the question “are you better off today than you were 4 years ago?” 

When Carter took on 20 January 1977:
- Gas was inflation adjusted $2.93/gal
- Inflation was 6.5%

When Carter left Office:
- Gas was Inflation adjusted $4.14/gal
- Inflation was 13.3%

If Biden were to have to run today the question would be, “are you better today than you were 2 years ago?”

On Inauguration Day 20 January 2021: 
- Gas was $2.38/gal national average 
- Inflation was 1.4%
  -- Because of Biden's Inflation the average American worker has taken a 3.5% pay cut in terms of buying power
- CBP Illegal apprehensions at the Southern Border:
   -- FY20: 646,822 (Trump's last year in office)

Today:
- Gas is $3.87/gal
- Inflation is 8.6%
- CBP Illegal apprehensions at the Southern Border:
  -- FY21: 1,148,024 (Biden's first year in office)
  -- FY22: 2,766,582 (Record Breaking) + another ~600,000 "Got Aways"

The answer is obvious. Biden has tanked the economy in 21 short months. Biden is Carter 2.0 so: “are you better off today than you were 21 months ago when Biden & Harris took office?” 

Monday, September 19, 2022

The Washington Post Never Learns to Avoid “Fake News” When It Comes to False Racial Reporting – They Got Burned with Sandmann, They Got Burned with the Wakefield-Marshall Football Incident and Now They Are Getting Burned with BYU – Duke Women’s Volleyball Fairytale – The WaPo Get’s Dupped Everytime!

 



BYU bans fan, relocates volleyball match after racist slurs, threats

By Glynn A. Hill and Cindy Boren

Updated August 28, 2022 at 2:29 p.m. EDT | Published August 27, 2022 at 9:51 p.m. EDT

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2022/08/27/byu-duke-volleyball-racist-incident/

The Washington Post (WaPo) ran this fairytale in August 2022 without any independent investigation and just taking the word of one Black Duke player.  The entire story just assumed it was true and the incident really happened but when it began to unravel the WaPo did no follow up article until three weeks later.  It would seem that after Duke’s racially charged Soccer Team fiasco that turned out to be a total lie, Duke would be more careful accusing another school with racism but it appears Duke learned nothing from their false experience.  What Duke did to BYU is identical to what happened to them years earlier. 

In a 16 September 2022 WaPo article highly critical of BYU’s diversity history, they did include this sentence buried in a 29 paragraph article: “After the episode became public, BYU launched an investigation, which it claimed found no ‘evidence to corroborate the allegation that fans engaged in racial heckling or uttered racial slurs’.”

Actually, BYU released a statement that included the following:

“As part of our commitment to take any claims of racism seriously, BYU has completed its investigation into the allegation that racial heckling and slurs took place at the Duke vs. BYU women’s volleyball match on August 26. We reviewed all available video and audio recordings, including security footage and raw footage from all camera angles taken by BYUtv of the match, with broadcasting audio removed (to ensure that the noise from the stands could be heard more clearly). We also reached out to more than 50 individuals who attended the event: Duke athletic department personnel and student-athletes, BYU athletic department personnel and student-athletes, event security and management and fans who were in the arena that evening, including many of the fans in the on-court student section.

From our extensive review, we have not found any evidence to corroborate the allegation that fans engaged in racial heckling or uttered racial slurs at the event. As we stated earlier, we would not tolerate any conduct that would make a student-athlete feel unsafe. That is the reason for our immediate response and our thorough investigation.”

https://byucougars.com/story/athletics/1300724/statement-byu-athletics-regarding-investigation-aug-26-volleyball-match

The fact that the WaPo ran with this fairytale is consistent with their past practices where they assume the worst and attribute racism to everything. Remember the Sandmann fiasco where the WaPo accused a 16 year old Cincinnati high school student of disrespecting a Native American in DC on the word of the Native American.  Turns out video confirmed it never happened and the Native American was a “stolen valor” non-Vietnam Vet who had been cashiered out of the Marine Corps Reserve with “bad paper” for misconduct. Because of the video and the accurate journalism of honest news outlets, the WaPo was forced to retract their previous stories and acknowledge they had been publishing what amounted to “Fake News.”  The WaPo settled out of Court paying Sandmann an undisclosed hefty sum to avoid the embarrassment of what would be revealed during discovery about their shoddy journalism.

THE WaPo’s MOST EGREGIOUS EXAMPLE OF WRONGLY ACCUSING HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS OF RACIAL WRONGDOING WAS LAST MARCH 2021 WHEN THEY PUBLISHED A “FAKE NEWS” STORY INVOLVING THE WAKEFIELD – MARSHALL FOOTBALL GAME.

This BYU-Duke article is reminiscent of the way the WaPo reported that incident in March 2021 when the Northern Virginia schools postponed their football season to the Spring because of COVID. A few days after a game between Wakefield and Marshall High Schools, the Wakefield football team and school administrators accused the Marshall team of taunting them with racial epithets. The WaPo only interviewed the Wakefield people for the story and declared the Marshall “guilty” as charged. Missing from the WaPo reporting was the fact the Marshall Team, parents, coaches, school administrators and even the Virginia High School League (VHSL) umpires officiating the game said there were no racial comments made but those facts never made it into the WaPo article. Fortunately, other sources did publish more balanced reports that included both sides of the story but NOT the WaPo.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/a-high-school-football-team-told-adults-they-were-spit-on-and-called-the-n-word-nothing-changed-until-a-player-posted-enough-is-enough/2021/03/20/fa0c7e78-8918-11eb-bfdf-4d36dab83a6d_story.html

The true story obviously didn’t fit the WaPo’s desired narrative so they opted to just “lie by omission.” Also, the initial WaPo article indicating there would be a VHSL investigation but the WaPo never reported the results because they did not support the WaPo/Wakefield version.

The Marshall parents issued a statement that “although the VHSL officials refuted the allegation, the Fairfax County Public School (FCPS) failure to issue a public statement refuting the allegations has compounded the harm to the Marshall players' health, psychological wellbeing, and reputations. None of us denies that racism exists in our society -- and none of us condones bigoted or hateful words or actions. But what we can say for sure is that there is no culture of racism in our football program. There is no evidence of racial slurs and spitting by the Marshall players or harassment by our coaches, volunteers and spectators on March 5. The irresponsible perpetuation of these false allegations is causing real damage," said the parents statement.

ABC7 spoke to several of the Marshall parents by phone and one parent said that Marshall players were required to wear masks the entire game due to COVID-19 protocols. "If they were going to spit, they would have to remove their masks," she said. "I was there, and it didn't happen."  Parents also said Marshall's interim principal spoke to parents with kids on the Marshall football team via phone and the principal told them that Marshall "conducted a full review and we could not corroborate or substantiate the allegations that racial slurs or spitting happened on the field." Also, even the Virginia High School League officials refuted the WaPo/Wakefield story but the WaPo failed to follow up their unfounded allegations with a truthful balanced article.

https://wjla.com/news/local/football-fallout-parents-at-wakefield-hs-marshall-hs-respond-after-racial-allegations

Another WaPo fiery tale that confirms: Democracy Dies in Darkness and the WaPo is Turning Out the Lights.

—————————

VHSL responds to calls for change after football team is accused of using racial slurs

https://wjla.com/news/local/vhsl-responds-to-calls-for-change-after-football-team-is-accused-of-using-racial-slurs


by Heather Graf

Friday, March 19th 2021

ARLINGTON, Va. (ABC7) — By Friday afternoon, more than 5,000 people had signed onto an online petition that demands "accountability and change" after serious allegations stemming from a high school football game in Northern Virginia.

Members of the Wakefield High School football team in Arlington say they were spit on and called racial slurs during a March 5 football game against the team at Marshall High School in Fairfax County.

The online petition, started by Wakefield parents, asks for apologies from both the Marshall football team and the Virginia High School League. It also asked for a reversal of any suspensions of Wakefield players, along with "mandatory diversity and inclusion training for local athletes, coaches, and officials".

On Friday evening, the two school districts with players involved in the incident issued a rare joint statement. You can read the statement in its entirety, posted on the Arlington Public Schools website and on the Fairfax County Public Schools website.

The statement says both FCPS and APS embrace diversity and strongly condemn hate speech and racial intolerance of any kind.

"This situation has deeply affected both school divisions, our families, students, and our respective communities. In recent days, it has provoked strong emotions in both communities, and has become divisive by pitting schools against one another. This is not about one team versus another; it is about our students and how we can come together to support them and take necessary actions to ensure this situation does not repeat itself. Our students deserve better," the joint statement says.

The two school districts say they will "be working together to repair the harm done" and to support their students. They also called on the Virginia High School League to enact change.

"Together, we ask the VHSL to join us in urging change to include mandatory diversity and inclusion training for high school athletes, coaches and officials. We also commit to provide training and education for our athletes, coaches and staff so that, together, we are all working to support students," the statement said.

Earlier in the day, ABC7 spoke to the Executive Director of the Virginia High School league, the organization that oversees high school sports in the Commonwealth.

"It makes me sad to hear this takes place anywhere, whether it's in a school building or on a football field, or any kind of thing," said Dr. Bill Haun, VHSL's Executive Director. "I mean, there's no place for this type of behavior and these types of comments and these things that have been alleged. There's no place for that in our society."

He said VHSL was made aware of the allegations shortly after the March 5 game between Wakefield and Marshall.

"We reviewed the video, we looked at the video, and we spoke with folks from both schools and followed the procedures we normally follow," said Haun. "We spoke with the officials and got all the information we could and then worked with the schools to talk about this, and then for the schools to do their investigations."

Haun also cited a VHSL policy that was put into place during the 2018-2019 school year that says any racial slur used in any athletic competition would result in an automatic ejection.

"Prior to that it was just a penalty, but we wanted to go a step further because we felt there's no place for anything like that in sports," he said.

The year that policy took effect, he says VHSL had 23 athletes ejected from games for the use of racial slurs. He said 19 of the 23 ejections came from the Northern Virginia Football Officials Association (NVFOA).

That's the association that was responsible for officiating the March 5 game between Wakefield and Marshall. ABC7 asked Haun whether the referees in that game properly followed VHSL policy.

"I would have to think they did," he said. "The officials said they were made aware by the Wakefield players that this was happening and said they were attune to that along with the rest of their officiating duties,and did not hear anything that warranted an ejection. They did not hear any racial slurs."

ABC7 has learned players from both teams were initially suspended for three games. The suspension was later reduced from three games to one.

Many members of the Wakefield community feel that their players should not have been disciplined in that way.

Prior to Friday's joint statement with FCPS, the Superintendent of Arlington Public Schools issued a strongly worded statement "calling on VHSL and all parties involved in extracurricular activities to reform and change their practices to ensure our schools and athletic events are free of racism, bigotry, hate speech and unsportsmanlike conduct".

Haun said he supports that call for reform.

"When we talk about reform and change, I agree that we do need to do something. Because when you do a penalty, that's reactive response to eliminating a problem. The proactive response is through education and educating people," he said.

But he also says VHSL staff can't make those changes on their own.

"I think this is an important point that people need to understand when they say VHSL needs to make changes. Nobody in our office makes the polices, all policies are made by our membership," he said. "We are a membership organization. We have 318 membership schools that encompass 133 school divisions."

VHSL also has an executive committee made up of 37 representatives from different schools and different regions throughout Virginia.

ABC7 asked what VHSL can do in the short term to address the concerns being voiced by school district leaders and community members.

"I think we continue to talk with our people, we continue to enforce the rules. But again, that's a reactive piece rather than a proactive piece," he said. "I'm talking with some folks at the Department of Education about possibly, they're doing some webinar type training right now, and I'm talking with them about partnering to sponsor some of those trainings on culturally sensitive stuff and seeing how we can move forward from there."

Wakefield's principal said it's important that these conversations happen sooner than later.

"If VHSL doesn't have the authority to mandate every school, they can at least set the example and at least put out an expectation that this is what we would like to see in every school and every conference," said Dr. Chris Willmore, the principal at Wakefield High School. "And what I would hope to see come from this, as the Arlington community and the Fairfax County community, is that we be willing to engage in those conversations. Because if we don't do it, the kids deserve better. And this country's not going to move forward."

Monday, August 15, 2022

How the Nation’s 51 Former Senior Intelligence Officials Labeling Information on the Hunter Laptop "Russian Disinformation" Demonstrated Their Incompetence

When it comes to Russian Disinformation, how can 51 of our country’s former most Senior Intelligence officials be so wrong and prove themselves totally clueless?

When it comes to truthfulness and accuracy, who is more credible when it comes to Hunter Biden’s Laptop, Trump or the 51 former senior intelligence officials that labeled the emails on it “Russian disinformation?

“John F. Kelly, Trump’s former chief of staff, said the former president …. His (Trump) sense was that the people who are in the intel business are incompetent, and he knew better ….”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/08/13/trump-mar-a-lago-search/

Based on the below two articles, it appears Trump was correct that senior “people who are in the intel business are both incompetent and arrogant, and he did know better.”

“More than 50 former senior intelligence officials signed on to a letter outlining their belief that the recent disclosure of emails allegedly belonging to Joe Biden’s son “has all the classic earmarks of a Russian disinformation operation.”

Letter signers include:
James Clapper
Mike Hayden
John Brennan
Leon Panetta
+ 47 other former Senior US Government Intelligence officials
https://www.politico.com/amp/news/2020/10/19/hunter-biden-story-russian-disinfo-430276

“Thousands of emails purportedly from the laptop computer of Hunter Biden, President Biden’s son, are authentic communications that can be verifiedthrough cryptographic signatures from Google and other technology companies, say two security experts who examined the data at the request of The Washington Post.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-laptop-data-examined/

According to CBS News: “President Biden (The Big Guy) interweaved his finances with his son Hunter. Messages obtained from Hunter Biden's infamous laptop reportedly reveal President Joe Biden was more intertwined with his son's business dealings and finances than many previously believed…. emails and texts gathered by FBI and congressional investigators from Hunter Biden's laptop show President Biden not only "rubbed elbows" with some of his son Hunter's business partners, but he also allowed Hunter to pay some of his bills . …”

Read the whole CBS article to see how the Biden Crime Family operated and, in mafia vernacular, Joe “The Big Guy” was the Head of the Family presiding over the illicit operations.

https://cbsaustin.com/amp/news/nation-world/president-biden-interweaved-his-finances-with-his-son-hunter-messages-show-joe-laptop-text-email