Monday, September 19, 2022

The Washington Post Never Learns to Avoid “Fake News” When It Comes to False Racial Reporting – They Got Burned with Sandmann, They Got Burned with the Wakefield-Marshall Football Incident and Now They Are Getting Burned with BYU – Duke Women’s Volleyball Fairytale – The WaPo Get’s Dupped Everytime!

 



BYU bans fan, relocates volleyball match after racist slurs, threats

By Glynn A. Hill and Cindy Boren

Updated August 28, 2022 at 2:29 p.m. EDT | Published August 27, 2022 at 9:51 p.m. EDT

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2022/08/27/byu-duke-volleyball-racist-incident/

The Washington Post (WaPo) ran this fairytale in August 2022 without any independent investigation and just taking the word of one Black Duke player.  The entire story just assumed it was true and the incident really happened but when it began to unravel the WaPo did no follow up article until three weeks later.  It would seem that after Duke’s racially charged Soccer Team fiasco that turned out to be a total lie, Duke would be more careful accusing another school with racism but it appears Duke learned nothing from their false experience.  What Duke did to BYU is identical to what happened to them years earlier. 

In a 16 September 2022 WaPo article highly critical of BYU’s diversity history, they did include this sentence buried in a 29 paragraph article: “After the episode became public, BYU launched an investigation, which it claimed found no ‘evidence to corroborate the allegation that fans engaged in racial heckling or uttered racial slurs’.”

Actually, BYU released a statement that included the following:

“As part of our commitment to take any claims of racism seriously, BYU has completed its investigation into the allegation that racial heckling and slurs took place at the Duke vs. BYU women’s volleyball match on August 26. We reviewed all available video and audio recordings, including security footage and raw footage from all camera angles taken by BYUtv of the match, with broadcasting audio removed (to ensure that the noise from the stands could be heard more clearly). We also reached out to more than 50 individuals who attended the event: Duke athletic department personnel and student-athletes, BYU athletic department personnel and student-athletes, event security and management and fans who were in the arena that evening, including many of the fans in the on-court student section.

From our extensive review, we have not found any evidence to corroborate the allegation that fans engaged in racial heckling or uttered racial slurs at the event. As we stated earlier, we would not tolerate any conduct that would make a student-athlete feel unsafe. That is the reason for our immediate response and our thorough investigation.”

https://byucougars.com/story/athletics/1300724/statement-byu-athletics-regarding-investigation-aug-26-volleyball-match

The fact that the WaPo ran with this fairytale is consistent with their past practices where they assume the worst and attribute racism to everything. Remember the Sandmann fiasco where the WaPo accused a 16 year old Cincinnati high school student of disrespecting a Native American in DC on the word of the Native American.  Turns out video confirmed it never happened and the Native American was a “stolen valor” non-Vietnam Vet who had been cashiered out of the Marine Corps Reserve with “bad paper” for misconduct. Because of the video and the accurate journalism of honest news outlets, the WaPo was forced to retract their previous stories and acknowledge they had been publishing what amounted to “Fake News.”  The WaPo settled out of Court paying Sandmann an undisclosed hefty sum to avoid the embarrassment of what would be revealed during discovery about their shoddy journalism.

THE WaPo’s MOST EGREGIOUS EXAMPLE OF WRONGLY ACCUSING HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS OF RACIAL WRONGDOING WAS LAST MARCH 2021 WHEN THEY PUBLISHED A “FAKE NEWS” STORY INVOLVING THE WAKEFIELD – MARSHALL FOOTBALL GAME.

This BYU-Duke article is reminiscent of the way the WaPo reported that incident in March 2021 when the Northern Virginia schools postponed their football season to the Spring because of COVID. A few days after a game between Wakefield and Marshall High Schools, the Wakefield football team and school administrators accused the Marshall team of taunting them with racial epithets. The WaPo only interviewed the Wakefield people for the story and declared the Marshall “guilty” as charged. Missing from the WaPo reporting was the fact the Marshall Team, parents, coaches, school administrators and even the Virginia High School League (VHSL) umpires officiating the game said there were no racial comments made but those facts never made it into the WaPo article. Fortunately, other sources did publish more balanced reports that included both sides of the story but NOT the WaPo.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/a-high-school-football-team-told-adults-they-were-spit-on-and-called-the-n-word-nothing-changed-until-a-player-posted-enough-is-enough/2021/03/20/fa0c7e78-8918-11eb-bfdf-4d36dab83a6d_story.html

The true story obviously didn’t fit the WaPo’s desired narrative so they opted to just “lie by omission.” Also, the initial WaPo article indicating there would be a VHSL investigation but the WaPo never reported the results because they did not support the WaPo/Wakefield version.

The Marshall parents issued a statement that “although the VHSL officials refuted the allegation, the Fairfax County Public School (FCPS) failure to issue a public statement refuting the allegations has compounded the harm to the Marshall players' health, psychological wellbeing, and reputations. None of us denies that racism exists in our society -- and none of us condones bigoted or hateful words or actions. But what we can say for sure is that there is no culture of racism in our football program. There is no evidence of racial slurs and spitting by the Marshall players or harassment by our coaches, volunteers and spectators on March 5. The irresponsible perpetuation of these false allegations is causing real damage," said the parents statement.

ABC7 spoke to several of the Marshall parents by phone and one parent said that Marshall players were required to wear masks the entire game due to COVID-19 protocols. "If they were going to spit, they would have to remove their masks," she said. "I was there, and it didn't happen."  Parents also said Marshall's interim principal spoke to parents with kids on the Marshall football team via phone and the principal told them that Marshall "conducted a full review and we could not corroborate or substantiate the allegations that racial slurs or spitting happened on the field." Also, even the Virginia High School League officials refuted the WaPo/Wakefield story but the WaPo failed to follow up their unfounded allegations with a truthful balanced article.

https://wjla.com/news/local/football-fallout-parents-at-wakefield-hs-marshall-hs-respond-after-racial-allegations

Another WaPo fiery tale that confirms: Democracy Dies in Darkness and the WaPo is Turning Out the Lights.

—————————

VHSL responds to calls for change after football team is accused of using racial slurs

https://wjla.com/news/local/vhsl-responds-to-calls-for-change-after-football-team-is-accused-of-using-racial-slurs


by Heather Graf

Friday, March 19th 2021

ARLINGTON, Va. (ABC7) — By Friday afternoon, more than 5,000 people had signed onto an online petition that demands "accountability and change" after serious allegations stemming from a high school football game in Northern Virginia.

Members of the Wakefield High School football team in Arlington say they were spit on and called racial slurs during a March 5 football game against the team at Marshall High School in Fairfax County.

The online petition, started by Wakefield parents, asks for apologies from both the Marshall football team and the Virginia High School League. It also asked for a reversal of any suspensions of Wakefield players, along with "mandatory diversity and inclusion training for local athletes, coaches, and officials".

On Friday evening, the two school districts with players involved in the incident issued a rare joint statement. You can read the statement in its entirety, posted on the Arlington Public Schools website and on the Fairfax County Public Schools website.

The statement says both FCPS and APS embrace diversity and strongly condemn hate speech and racial intolerance of any kind.

"This situation has deeply affected both school divisions, our families, students, and our respective communities. In recent days, it has provoked strong emotions in both communities, and has become divisive by pitting schools against one another. This is not about one team versus another; it is about our students and how we can come together to support them and take necessary actions to ensure this situation does not repeat itself. Our students deserve better," the joint statement says.

The two school districts say they will "be working together to repair the harm done" and to support their students. They also called on the Virginia High School League to enact change.

"Together, we ask the VHSL to join us in urging change to include mandatory diversity and inclusion training for high school athletes, coaches and officials. We also commit to provide training and education for our athletes, coaches and staff so that, together, we are all working to support students," the statement said.

Earlier in the day, ABC7 spoke to the Executive Director of the Virginia High School league, the organization that oversees high school sports in the Commonwealth.

"It makes me sad to hear this takes place anywhere, whether it's in a school building or on a football field, or any kind of thing," said Dr. Bill Haun, VHSL's Executive Director. "I mean, there's no place for this type of behavior and these types of comments and these things that have been alleged. There's no place for that in our society."

He said VHSL was made aware of the allegations shortly after the March 5 game between Wakefield and Marshall.

"We reviewed the video, we looked at the video, and we spoke with folks from both schools and followed the procedures we normally follow," said Haun. "We spoke with the officials and got all the information we could and then worked with the schools to talk about this, and then for the schools to do their investigations."

Haun also cited a VHSL policy that was put into place during the 2018-2019 school year that says any racial slur used in any athletic competition would result in an automatic ejection.

"Prior to that it was just a penalty, but we wanted to go a step further because we felt there's no place for anything like that in sports," he said.

The year that policy took effect, he says VHSL had 23 athletes ejected from games for the use of racial slurs. He said 19 of the 23 ejections came from the Northern Virginia Football Officials Association (NVFOA).

That's the association that was responsible for officiating the March 5 game between Wakefield and Marshall. ABC7 asked Haun whether the referees in that game properly followed VHSL policy.

"I would have to think they did," he said. "The officials said they were made aware by the Wakefield players that this was happening and said they were attune to that along with the rest of their officiating duties,and did not hear anything that warranted an ejection. They did not hear any racial slurs."

ABC7 has learned players from both teams were initially suspended for three games. The suspension was later reduced from three games to one.

Many members of the Wakefield community feel that their players should not have been disciplined in that way.

Prior to Friday's joint statement with FCPS, the Superintendent of Arlington Public Schools issued a strongly worded statement "calling on VHSL and all parties involved in extracurricular activities to reform and change their practices to ensure our schools and athletic events are free of racism, bigotry, hate speech and unsportsmanlike conduct".

Haun said he supports that call for reform.

"When we talk about reform and change, I agree that we do need to do something. Because when you do a penalty, that's reactive response to eliminating a problem. The proactive response is through education and educating people," he said.

But he also says VHSL staff can't make those changes on their own.

"I think this is an important point that people need to understand when they say VHSL needs to make changes. Nobody in our office makes the polices, all policies are made by our membership," he said. "We are a membership organization. We have 318 membership schools that encompass 133 school divisions."

VHSL also has an executive committee made up of 37 representatives from different schools and different regions throughout Virginia.

ABC7 asked what VHSL can do in the short term to address the concerns being voiced by school district leaders and community members.

"I think we continue to talk with our people, we continue to enforce the rules. But again, that's a reactive piece rather than a proactive piece," he said. "I'm talking with some folks at the Department of Education about possibly, they're doing some webinar type training right now, and I'm talking with them about partnering to sponsor some of those trainings on culturally sensitive stuff and seeing how we can move forward from there."

Wakefield's principal said it's important that these conversations happen sooner than later.

"If VHSL doesn't have the authority to mandate every school, they can at least set the example and at least put out an expectation that this is what we would like to see in every school and every conference," said Dr. Chris Willmore, the principal at Wakefield High School. "And what I would hope to see come from this, as the Arlington community and the Fairfax County community, is that we be willing to engage in those conversations. Because if we don't do it, the kids deserve better. And this country's not going to move forward."

Monday, August 15, 2022

How the Nation’s 51 Former Senior Intelligence Officials Labeling Information on the Hunter Laptop "Russian Disinformation" Demonstrated Their Incompetence

When it comes to Russian Disinformation, how can 51 of our country’s former most Senior Intelligence officials be so wrong and prove themselves totally clueless?

When it comes to truthfulness and accuracy, who is more credible when it comes to Hunter Biden’s Laptop, Trump or the 51 former senior intelligence officials that labeled the emails on it “Russian disinformation?

“John F. Kelly, Trump’s former chief of staff, said the former president …. His (Trump) sense was that the people who are in the intel business are incompetent, and he knew better ….”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/08/13/trump-mar-a-lago-search/

Based on the below two articles, it appears Trump was correct that senior “people who are in the intel business are both incompetent and arrogant, and he did know better.”

“More than 50 former senior intelligence officials signed on to a letter outlining their belief that the recent disclosure of emails allegedly belonging to Joe Biden’s son “has all the classic earmarks of a Russian disinformation operation.”

Letter signers include:
James Clapper
Mike Hayden
John Brennan
Leon Panetta
+ 47 other former Senior US Government Intelligence officials
https://www.politico.com/amp/news/2020/10/19/hunter-biden-story-russian-disinfo-430276

“Thousands of emails purportedly from the laptop computer of Hunter Biden, President Biden’s son, are authentic communications that can be verifiedthrough cryptographic signatures from Google and other technology companies, say two security experts who examined the data at the request of The Washington Post.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-laptop-data-examined/

According to CBS News: “President Biden (The Big Guy) interweaved his finances with his son Hunter. Messages obtained from Hunter Biden's infamous laptop reportedly reveal President Joe Biden was more intertwined with his son's business dealings and finances than many previously believed…. emails and texts gathered by FBI and congressional investigators from Hunter Biden's laptop show President Biden not only "rubbed elbows" with some of his son Hunter's business partners, but he also allowed Hunter to pay some of his bills . …”

Read the whole CBS article to see how the Biden Crime Family operated and, in mafia vernacular, Joe “The Big Guy” was the Head of the Family presiding over the illicit operations.

https://cbsaustin.com/amp/news/nation-world/president-biden-interweaved-his-finances-with-his-son-hunter-messages-show-joe-laptop-text-email 

Saturday, April 30, 2022

More Dispelling the Myth of Marine "Uniqueness"

Way back on 21 November 2010, I wrote an article in this Blog entitled:

Marine Commandant: Marines are Unique – Dispelling the Myths about Marines

questioning an assertion by the then new Marine Corps Commandant, Gen Amos, that “Marines are unique.” This assertion was reported in a 7 November 2010 Washington Post Federal Page article. As a Soldier for 30 years going from enlisted man squad leader as a sergeant to and commanding units from 2LT (earning a Combat Infantryman Badge) to full Colonel, I totally reject there is anything “unique” about a Marine Infantryman. In fact, since World War II, the Marine Corps has become just another, abet smaller, ground army and their performance has been identical to that of regular Army Infantry units in every conflict. In his definitive account of the Korean War, The Forgotten War, the author Clay Blair proves this beyond any doubt for Korea.  Also, for all their hype, in World War II the US 8th Air Force alone (one of 16 numbered US Air Forces in the War) had more men killed (27,000), almost all in actual combat, than the entire Marine Corps (24,000) suffered including those lost in bar fights around Camp Lejeune.

Over the years I have worked with Marines and even had some attached to me for extended periods and, except for the PR commissars assigned down to the squad level, I found them identical to and even interchangeable with my Soldiers.  As a result of my previous experiences with Marines, I was surprised to learn when I visited the Marine Corps Museum at Quantico that the Marines had won for us every War our Country has fought. Just to put the Marine Corps’ contribution in ALL our armed conflicts in perspective, I will Insert this chart that reflects the sacrifices each of our Military services has made by War:



As further testament to who has “fought our Country’s Battles on the Land” for the past 246 years, here is a list of the 10 deadliest Battles in US History and Marines have only participated in two of them (#1 & #6):


1.    Meuse-Argonne Offensive, World War I, Sep-Nov 1918; 26,277 US Killed.  Of the 2 Million US Military deployed overseas in WWI, only 30,000 were Marines with almost half arriving after the Armistice and remaining for occupation duty.  Of the 116,516 deaths from all causes in the War, only 2851 were Marines. Only one Marine Brigade commanded by US Army BG James G. Harbord served in Combat as the 4th Brigade of the 2nd US Army Infantry Division.


2.    Battle of the Bulge, World War II, Dec 1944-Jan 1945; 19,200 US Soldiers Killed.


3.    The Battle for France, World War II; Jul-Sep 1944; 17,844 US Soldiers Killed.


4.    The Battle for Normandy, World War II, Jun-Jul 1944; 16,293 US Soldiers Killed.


5.    Battle for Western Germany, World War II, Mar-May 1945; 15,000 US Soldiers Killed.


6.    Battle for Okinawa, World War II, Apr-Jun 1945; 12,500 US Killed (4907 Navy, 4582 Army, 2792 Marines with another 7,700 US dead from wounds or non-combat).


7.    Huertgen Forrest, World War II, Sep-Dec 1944, 12,000 US Soldiers Killed.


8.    Luzon Philippines, World War II, Jan-Aug 1945; 10,380 US Soldiers Killed.


9.    The Gothic Line, Northern Apennines Italy; World War II, Sep 44-Apr 45; 10,380 US Soldiers Killed.


10. Operation Dragoon, Southern France; World War II, Aug-Sep 1944; 7301 US Soldiers Killed.

Wednesday, April 6, 2022

Why Comments in the Washington Post Comments Sections Run Ten to One Liberal



I’ve been a Washington Post (WaPo) subscriber off and on for 60+ years and 30 years continuously this time.  Although it’s always been an ultra-Liberal Socialist Rag, I’ve maintained my subscription to understand the alternative reality of the Liberal Left and some comic relief as their obvious mistakes are so blatant as to be humorous.  Because Liberals rarely serve in the Military and the rank-in-file WaPo is an ultra-Liberal, many of their more blatant errors are in their Military coverage although their other coverage gets its fair share of faux paus.

In recent years I have been a frequent WaPo commenter gleefully pointing out and correcting their numerous errors but have noticed fewer and fewer comments from Conservative readers have been showing up.  I had assumed that this lack of Conservative comments was attributable to fewer and fewer Conservative WaPo subscribers as the paper kept drifting further and further to the Left but recently I have learned otherwise.  It seems the WaPo just censors, deletes and ultimately bans Conservative commenters to avoid WaPo embarrassment from having their errors and biased coverage exposed.  I know this because that is what has happened to me.

Although I was routinely making respectful but provocative comments, for some reason and without warning or justification my ability to comment was abruptly and without notice shut off and I was banned.  A couple of times a week my comments would garner “most responses” and were often even WaPo featured comments but that made no difference. My only transgression was I routinely pointed out glaring mistakes in their reporting that I’m sure were embarrassing to the WaPo because it called into question the accuracy of their entire article.

Although being banned was irritating, what was even more so was the WaPo had the chutzpah to tell me: “If you think this has been done in error, please contact our community team.” Of course they failed to mention that when someone “contacts the community team” they get the below “auto-reply” so what is the point in the WaPo directing someone to contact their community team? It is obvious there is NO Community Team, just an auto-reply that tells loyal readers to “go pound sand.”

The only good thing that has come out of this experience is I have found out why WaPo Comments are so heavily skewed Liberal and only occasionally does a Conservative comment slip by the WaPo censors.  It's because as soon as a Conservative commenter is detected, they are banned and never heard from again.  Mystery solved and, in the immortal words of Paul Harvey, “Now you know the rest of the story.”

Since being banned weeks ago, I have written, emailed and phoned the WaPo several time to appeal my ban but have gotten only the below auto-reply and definitely no satisfaction.  I will attach below my latest exchange and the email I sent directly to the WaPo Executive Editor but I'm confident I will never hear from a real live Washington Post person ever!


To: Army-COL
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 5:43 PM
To: Sally.Buzbee@WashPost.com
Cc: Kat.Downs@WashPost.com
Subject: FW: Response to Ticket #[2249327] Re: I have been banned from commenting with no explanation and for no reason

Ms. Buzbee, Washington Post Executive Editor,

            See below, I am a retired U.S. Army Colonel/06 with 30 years of service serving in significant Pentagon positions. I routinely make respectful but provocative comments and a couple of times a week my comments would garner “most responses” and are often featured. For some reason and with no warning or justification my ability to comment was suspended/banned. My only transgression is I routinely point out glaring mistakes in your reporting that I’m sure are embarrassing to the Post because it calls into question the accuracy of your entire article.

Part of my frustration is the capricious and arbitrary manner in which you exercise your power of censorship which probably accounts for why the overwhelming majority of your comments lean left; you just ban anyone that might post a right leaning comment or point out an obvious mistake in your reporting. One example was recently your crack military reporter mentioned someone in their article “had been drafted into the Navy during Vietnam.” When I pointed out the Navy not only DID NOT use the draft during Vietnam but had not drafted anyone since WWII, my comment was deleted as “violating community standards.” Seem “facts” must violate WaPo “Community Standards.”

Finally, here is the way you inform a reader they have been banned, they get this banner when they got to comments:

Your account has been banned from commenting.

Someone with access to your account has violated our community guidelines. As a result, your account has been banned. You will no longer be able to comment, use reactions or report comments. If you think this has been done in error, please contact our community team.

The height of chutzpah is when you say: “If you think this has been done in error, please contact our community team.” When someone “contacts the community team” they get the below “auto-reply” so what is the point in you directing someone to contact the community team?

Although I don’t expect you to even read this email let alone reply but it feels good to get this off my chest.  Regardless, I have a Blog with ~ a quarter of a million hit and I intend to begin posting all the WaPo mistake with my corrections there.   Previously, I would have just posted them in your comments.

v/r

Army-COL

Blog:  https://old-soldier-colonel.blogspot.com/


From: Washington Post Customer Care [mailto:help@washpost.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 1:54 PM
To: Army-COL
Subject: Response to Ticket #[2249327] Re: I have been banned from commenting with no explanation and for no reason

##- Please type your reply above this line -##

Washington Post (Washington Post Customer Care)

Mar 29, 2022, 1:54 PM EDT

Hello,
 
Thank you for reaching out to The Post about your commenting account.
 
Moderators may suspend or ban a reader after they post multiple comments against our rules. Suspensions will automatically lift after the allotted time. A ban is a permanent block from commenting on the site.
 
Suspensions and bans only preclude readers from posting in discussions on The Post. If you are suspended or banned, you will still be able to read all of The Post’s reporting.

Due to the volume of messages we receive, we cannot respond to requests to appeal bans or explain suspensions. If you are banned, do not attempt to create a new account after being banned. We will also ban the new account.


Army-COL

Mar 29, 2022, 10:13 AM EDT

I am a retired U.S. Army Colonel/06 with 30 years of service serving in significant Pentagon positions. I routinely make respectful but provocative comments and a couple of times a week my comments would garner “most responses” and often featured. For some reason and with no warning or justification my ability to comment was suspended/banned. My only transgression is I routinely point out glaring mistakes in your reporting that I’m sure are embarrassing to the Post because it calls into question the accuracy of your entire article. I realize your reporters are not Military knowledgeable so make these errors out of ignorance but embarrassment should not be a reason to ban someone that has been a WaPo subscriber for over 50 years. Your banning message says that if you believe the ban was done in error, contact the Community Team. When I contacted the Community Team I got an automatic reply saying “we get many requests so we don’t respond to inquiries about bans.” If that’s the case, why do you tell people to contact the Community Team? Bottom line, in all fairness, I request my ban be lifted.

This email is a service from Washington Post Customer Care.


To further prove my point, before I was out right banned, one of my factual comments I posted was removed by the WaPo as “violating WaPo Community Standards.”  The only “WaPo Standard” violated was being 100% factual and contradicting WaPo Fake News.  Below is what I sent to the WaPo to find out what I had done so I wouldn’t repeat my “transgression.”  Of course the WaPo never bothered to respond.

This below was the comment I made to the article: “Former Special Forces soldier and onetime congressional candidate arrested in Capitol riot case

Jeremy Brown, former Special Forces soldier and congressional candidate, arrested in Capitol riot case - The Washington Post

 

And the WaPo removed it with the following comment:

This commenter has been removed by a moderator for violating our community guidelines.

So that I don’t violate WaPo “standards” in the future, can you tell me what, other than being critical of the Washington Post, was objectionable about this below comment?

 

THANKS

 

COLONEL (Retired) US Army

 

===========================================================================

I think the 6 January Insurrection was horrendous and condemn everyone that participated but for Mr. Hawkins to claim “Five people died as a result of the riot” is disingenuous, misleading and untrue.

Dr. Francisco Diaz, the district's chief medical examiner, announced the causes of deaths as:

Capitol Police officer Brian D. Sicknick suffered two strokes and died of natural causes a day after he confronted rioters at the Jan. 6 insurrection, the District’s chief medical examiner has ruled…. the autopsy found no evidence the 42-year-old officer suffered an allergic reaction to chemical irritants…”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/brian-sicknick-death-strokes/2021/04/19/36d2d310-617e-11eb-afbe-9a11a127d146_story.html

Ashli Babbitt, 35, died by homicide from a gunshot to the left shoulder. She was shot by a Capitol police officer while trying to climb through a door near the House chamber.

Kevin Greeson, 55, died of natural causes from cardiovascular disease. From Greeson, of Athens, Alabama.

Benjamin Phillips, 50, died of natural causes from cardiovascular disease. According to the Philadelphia Inquirer, Phillips of Ringtown, Pennsylvania, was a computer programmer who founded a social media website for Trump supporters.

Roseanne Boyland, 34, died by accident from acute amphetamine intoxication. Boyland, of Georgia, wanted to be a sobriety counselor.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/04/07/capitol-riot-deaths-cause-death-released-4-5-not-sicknick/7128040002/

The Only person that died on 6 Jan or as a result of the Insurrection was Ashli Babbott.  Two people with heart disease died of a heart attack, one drug abuser OD’ed, and the Capitol Police Officer died but none of the deaths were attributed by the DC Medical Examiner.

“Democracy Dies in Darkness and the WaPo is Turning Out the Lights.”

Added: In 2025 under the Federal Tort Claims Act, the estate of Ashli Babbitt (the woman who was shot and killed on 6 Jan 2021 during the U.S. Capitol incident) filed a tort lawsuit and reached a nearly $5 million settlement with the government.

The most disingenuous thing in this article is Derick linking to this early WaPo article: https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/legal-issues/two-arrested-in-assault-on-police-officer-brian-d-sicknick-who-died-after-jan-6-capitol-riot/2021/03/15/80261550-84ff-11eb-bfdf-4d36dab83a6d_story.html?itid=lk_inline_manual_12&itid=lk_inline_manual_10

Instead of this later WaPo article correcting the misinformation in his referenced article: https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/brian-sicknick-death-strokes/2021/04/19/36d2d310-617e-11eb-afbe-9a11a127d146_story.html

That is a blatant effort to mislead readers. Typical of a dishonest WaPo writer (can’t call him a “reporter” or even a “journalist”).

Sunday, March 20, 2022

The Renaming Commission Has Announced the Contenders for Renaming Army Posts Named for Confederates – But How They Arrived at Many of Them Is Mystifying!

The Confederate renaming commission has narrowed down tens of thousands of recommendations into a list of 87 new names (see Below) for the nine (9) Army posts originally named in honor of Confederate troops.

The nine (9) Army posts on the renaming list are Forts Lee, A.P. Hill and Pickett, in Virginia; Forts Benning and Gordon in Georgia; Fort Bragg in North Carolina; Fort Rucker in Alabama; Fort Polk in Louisiana; and Fort Hood in Texas.

The Congressionally appointed Commission’s mission was to provide naming, renaming, and removal recommendations to Congress for all Department of Defense items that commemorate the Confederate States of America or any person who served voluntarily with the Confederate States of America.

Although retired Navy Admiral Michelle Howard, Chair of the Naming Commission, said in a news release: “It’s important that the names we recommend for these installations appropriately reflect the courage, values and sacrifices of our diverse military men and women …. We also are considering the local and regional significance of names and their potential to inspire and motivate our service members.” the Commission only included these seven names (highlighted Below Red Bold) that would even be recognizable to most Soldiers let alone the average American and definitely worthy of such recognition:

 

President/General of the Army the Army Dwight D. Eisenhower – President of the United States, Supreme Allied Commander Europe, and Chief of Staff Army.

 

General of the Army George C. Marshall – Chief of Staff Army (During WWII), Secretary of State, and Secretary of Defense.

 

General of the Army Omar N. Bradley – Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Chief of Staff Army and Head of the Veterans Affairs Administration.

 

General Colin Powell – Chairman of the Joint Chef of Staff, National Security Advisor and Secretary of State.

 

Sergeant/Major Alvin C. York –Medal of Honor Recipient and most celebrated Soldier of World War I.

 

Colonel Robert L. Howard - Medal of Honor Recipient and most decorated Soldier in the history of the Army and of the Vietnam Nam War (see below).

 

Major Audie L. Murphy - Medal of Honor Recipient and most decorated Soldier of World War II (see Below)

 

The choices were narrowed down from more than 34,000 submissions, including 3,670 unique names, according to the release. The names were gathered both from an online form and from site visits to the posts to speak with troops there and surrounding community leaders. What is mystifying is how the Commission selected many of the obscure and dubiously worthy candidates they did while not selecting such obviously noteworthy American heroes as General of the Armies John J. Pershing who led American Forces in World War I and was Chief of Staff Army, President/General of the Army Ulysses S. Grant who led the Union Army to victory in the Civil War, President/General Zachary Taylor who led the Army to victory in the Mexican-American War, or even General George S. Patton of World War II fame.  One other not so recognizable name but would be obvious to any Army Logistician would be General Johnnie E. Wilson, the first Black 4-Star Army Materiel Command commander.  In my opinion, Admiral Howard needs to reconvene her Commission and go back to the drawing board.

The Commission did not make any recommendations associating candidate names with specific Posts but the three that are beyond obvious are these three for Fort Hood, Fort Bragg and Fort Lee:

The first “no-brainer” has to be to name Fort Hood for Major Audie L. Murphy, a native Texan and the most decorated US Soldier of World War II. He had every award for valor the Army can award. Not only did he have the Medal of Honor but he also had the Distinguished Service Cross, the highest award the Army can award for Valor, two (2) Silver Stars, two (2) Bronze Stars for Valor and three (3) Purple Hearts. He also had several other US and foreign awards.  Significantly, all these awards were awarded during the largest War this country has ever fought with over 12 Million men and women in uniform and over 400,000 service members killed.

The second “no-brainer” has to be naming Fort Bragg, the home of the US Army Special Forces, for the most decorated US Soldier of the Vietnam War and in the entire history of the US Army, Colonel Robert L. Howard. A Green Beret, he was nominated for the Medal of Honor three times but received lesser medals for the first two nominations which were for actions performed in Cambodia where the U.S. was fighting covertly. He was finally awarded the Medal of Honor for his actions on December 30, 1968, his third nomination. In addition to the MOH, Colonel Howard was also awarded the Distinguished Service Cross, the highest award the Army can award for Valor, the Silver Stars, four (4) Bronze Stars for Valor and eight (8) Purple Hearts. He also had several other US and foreign awards. He had 54 months in combat and no other member of any service came even close to Colonel Howard’s record of valor in the Vietnam War.

The third "no brainer" has to be naming Fort Lee, the home of the US Army Sustainment Center of Excellence, for General Johnnie E. Wilson, who as the first Black Commanding
General of the Army Materiel Command (AMC), was the most senior Logistician in the entire US Army. He enlisted in the Army in1961 and in 1967 attended Officer Candidate School as a Staff Sergeant (E-6); upon graduation he was commissioned a second lieutenant in the Ordnance Corps. He held a wide variety of important command and staff positions including the Army Deputy Chief of Staff for Logistics, AMC Chief of Staff, and Commanding General of the Army Ordnance Center & School. In Vietnam he commanded the Maintenance Company in the 173d Airborne Brigade.